BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka455Delhi204Mumbai137Chennai110Ahmedabad49Bangalore46Kolkata42Cochin42Pune40Jaipur28Lucknow17Calcutta16Indore13Allahabad12Surat11Rajkot10Jodhpur9Cuttack9Chandigarh8Nagpur7Patna6Telangana6Rajasthan5Kerala5Hyderabad5Raipur3SC3Jabalpur2Dehradun2Guwahati2Agra2Andhra Pradesh1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)7Section 119(2)(b)6Section 115Section 143(3)4Section 2504Exemption4Section 12A3Condonation of Delay3Section 11(2)

ACIT,CIRCLE-13(1), HYDERABAD vs. M/S SURESH PRODUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, the ground of the revenue is allowed

ITA 1633/HYD/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Jul 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)Section 80I

section ITA No.1633/Hyd/2014 Page 14 201(1) of the Act before making addition of Rs.11,82,480/-. Hence this ground of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 8.6 Hence the Ground No.3 of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 9. Ground No.4 of the Revenue relates to deletion made by the Ld. CIT(A) of the additions

2
Deduction2
Addition to Income2
Disallowance2

SEVA BHARATHI,HYDERABAD vs. CIT., EXEMPTION WARD 1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA.No.1307/Hyd

ITA 365/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Oct 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.365 & 1307/Hyd/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year 2022-2023 Seva Bharathi, The Commissioner Of Hyderabad – 500 018. Income Tax Vs. Telangana. (Exemptions), Ward-1(4), Pan Aayts5233K Hyderabad – 500 004. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ca Sri Harsha राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 08.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 15.10.2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Rao:

For Appellant: CA Sri HarshaFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 250

Charitable Trust [2004] 158 taxmann.com 114 Order of ITAT Hyderabad in the case of Darga Ehazrat 2. Syedshah Khwajadas Chisti Unnayabi Perpetual Trust, Vatpalli vs., ITO (Exemptions), Ward-1(3), Hyderabad in ITA No.567/Hyd/2024, Dated 29.08.2024. Judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case 3. of St. Thomas High School vs., CIT (Exemptions) [2025] 178 taxmann.com

SEVA BHARATHI,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., EXEMPTION WARD 1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA.No.1307/Hyd

ITA 1307/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Oct 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.365 & 1307/Hyd/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year 2022-2023 Seva Bharathi, The Commissioner Of Hyderabad – 500 018. Income Tax Vs. Telangana. (Exemptions), Ward-1(4), Pan Aayts5233K Hyderabad – 500 004. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ca Sri Harsha राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 08.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 15.10.2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Rao:

For Appellant: CA Sri HarshaFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 250

Charitable Trust [2004] 158 taxmann.com 114 Order of ITAT Hyderabad in the case of Darga Ehazrat 2. Syedshah Khwajadas Chisti Unnayabi Perpetual Trust, Vatpalli vs., ITO (Exemptions), Ward-1(3), Hyderabad in ITA No.567/Hyd/2024, Dated 29.08.2024. Judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case 3. of St. Thomas High School vs., CIT (Exemptions) [2025] 178 taxmann.com

GLOBAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., EXEMPTION WARD-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 240/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No. 240/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22) Global University Foundation Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad (Exemption) Ward-1 Pan:Aaicg0020F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ca Suvibha Nolka राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Sankar Pandi, P, Sr.Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 11/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 26/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Raothis Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 14/07/2023 Of The Learned Cit (A)-Nfac Delhi, For The A.Y.2021-22. 2. There Is A Delay Of 506 Days In Filing The Present Appeal. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Which Is Supported By An Affidavit Of The Director Of The Assessee Foundation. The Learned Counsel For The Assessee Has Submitted That The Assessee Was Not Served With The Impugned Order Dated 14/07/2023 Passed By The Learned Cit (A) & Therefore, Due To The Non-Communication Of The Impugned Order, The Assessee

For Appellant: CA Suvibha NolkaFor Respondent: : Shri Sankar Pandi, P, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 143(1)

section 12 of The Act by rejecting such condonation application, but an assessee, a public charitable trust past 30 years who substantially satisfies the condition for availing such exemption, should not be denied the same merely on the bar of limitation especially when the legislature has conferred wide discretionary powers to condone such delay on the authorities concerned. 32.We

ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. NALGONDA DIOCESE SOCIETY, NALGONDA

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2063/HYD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alakamony, A.M. & Shri S.S.Godara, J.M.

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri M. Muralidhar, DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(47)(v)

trust (part of Rogationist of heart of jesus) are registered u/s 12A. Therefore, it is submitted that there is no violation of objects of the assessee society and hence assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 11. 5. I have considered the arguments of the assessee and have gone through the facts on record. It is accepted by Assessing Officer