BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

74 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 13(2)(h)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka470Mumbai392Delhi359Jaipur194Chennai193Bangalore176Chandigarh74Hyderabad74Ahmedabad68Pune62Kolkata57Cochin48Lucknow41Amritsar38Cuttack29Indore28Visakhapatnam19Allahabad19Telangana19Nagpur17Calcutta16Agra15Kerala10Raipur9SC8Jodhpur6Rajkot5Rajasthan5Surat5Varanasi4Punjab & Haryana3Andhra Pradesh2Jabalpur2Patna2Panaji2Ranchi1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 12A106Section 1052Section 1144Section 13241Addition to Income41Search & Seizure41Section 153C38Section 6938Section 139(1)

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONAL COMMITTE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 325/HYD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: Shri AV Raghuram, AdvocateFor Respondent: MS. M. Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

section 13(1)(c) r.w.s.13(2)(c), 13(2)(g) and 13(2)(h) of the Act by the assessee society. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) erred in not appreciating that the service agreement entered into between the assessee Society and M/s. Sri Kalyan Chakravorthy Memorial Educational Trust (SKCMET) and the companies

Showing 1–20 of 74 · Page 1 of 4

38
Section 143(3)37
Exemption32
Deduction16

ACIT., EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. PHARMACEUTICALS EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL OF INDIA, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is allowed

ITA 1199/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2016-17 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. Pharmaceuticals Export Of Income Tax, Promotion Council Of India, Exemptions, Circle – 1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aadcp4643C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rv. Chalam, C.A. Revenue By: Shri B. Balakrishna, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.02.2025

For Appellant: Shri RV. Chalam, C.AFor Respondent: Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12(1)Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144

13] A little historical background is necessary to be brought out in understanding the mandate of section 11. Section 11 corresponds to section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income- tax Act, 1922. [Para 14] Under the provision as it existed prior to 1-4-1952, there was no difference maintained between application of the income of the trust within

KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,WARANGAL vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1722/HYD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,WARANGAL vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1725/HYD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, WARANGAL

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1879/HYD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,WARANGAL vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1723/HYD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, WARANGAL

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1880/HYD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, WARANGAL

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1881/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1878/HYD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,WARANGAL vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1726/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , WARANGAL

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1877/HYD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

KAKATIYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,WARANGAL vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1724/HYD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavidiya –
Section 25l

H] Department of the erstwhile Government of Andhra Pradesh through several Government Orders [vide (1) G.O. Ms.No.51, MA dt.05.02.1996, (2) G.O. Ms. No.530 dt.28.09.1998 and (3) G.O. Ms. No.439 dt.13.06.2007] has authorized the utilization of an amount equivalent to 15% of the Development Charges collected towards administration and other maintenance expenditure of the assessee. The balance

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIZAMABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NIZAMABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 405/HYD/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIZAMABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NIZAMABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 408/HYD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIRMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NIRMAL

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 396/HYD/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIZAMABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NIZAMABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 394/HYD/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIRMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NIRMAL

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 395/HYD/2019[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIRMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NIRMAL

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 397/HYD/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIZAMABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NIZAMABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 404/HYD/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE,NIRMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NIRMAL

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA No

ITA 398/HYD/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2005-06 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Bodhan. Ward-2, Pan: Aaala 0787 C Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 234BSection 36(1)(xii)

H Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA No.405 to 408/Hyd/2019 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2007-08 Agricultural Market Vs. Income Tax Officer, Committee, Banswada. Ward-2, PAN: AAALA 0681 P Nizamabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 08/05/2019 Date of pronouncement: 29/05/2019 ORDER PER BENCH: In all these appeals