BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai53Jaipur34Delhi33Ahmedabad16Chennai14Bangalore13Chandigarh12Lucknow11Indore10Hyderabad7Pune6Kolkata6Varanasi5Raipur5Surat5Telangana5Nagpur3Amritsar2SC2Patna1Karnataka1Jodhpur1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 14A14Section 80I14Section 54E9Section 143(3)7Section 2636Deduction5Section 115J4Capital Gains4Disallowance4Addition to Income

NETMATRIX CROP CARE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 599/HYD/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Jul 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: Shri Jaydeep, C.AFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 50BSection 54E

80C for any assessment year beginning on or after the 1st day of April, 2006. Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,— (a) "cost", in relation to any long-term specified asset, means the amount invested in such specified asset out of capital gains

RAMESH BABU SEGU,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(1), HYDERABAD.

4
Section 153C3
Business Income3

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 137/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.137/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2018-19) Ramesh Babu Segu, Vs. Acit, Hyderabad. Central Circle-1(1), Pan: Amrps2069N Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Sri K A Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "वारा/Revenue By:: Ms. Payal Gupta, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing: 11/02/2026 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement: 13/02/2026 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By Shri Ramesh Babu Segu (“The Assessee”), Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Hyderabad (“Ld. Cit(A)”), Dated 19/11/2024 For The Assessment Year (“A.Y.”) 2018-19. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grouds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Sri K A Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: : Ms. Payal Gupta, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 69CSection 80C

capital gains arising from sale of immovable property by rejecting the fair market value adopted by the assessee as on 01.04.2001 and made an addition of Rs.1,41,54,990/-. The Ld. AO also made additions of Rs.13,440/- on account of business income and Rs.50,000/- on account of disallowance under section 80C

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NSL RENEWABLE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 166/HYD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar RampurwalaFor Respondent: Shri P. Chandra Sekhar
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 80I

gains of Kalamb unit for the purpose of determining the quantum of deduction under section 80-IA(5) of the Act is to be computed if such eligible business of the said unit is the only source of income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer mixed the profits of the Kalamb unit with the profits of units at Delhi

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NSL RENEWABLE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 165/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar RampurwalaFor Respondent: Shri P. Chandra Sekhar
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 80I

gains of Kalamb unit for the purpose of determining the quantum of deduction under section 80-IA(5) of the Act is to be computed if such eligible business of the said unit is the only source of income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer mixed the profits of the Kalamb unit with the profits of units at Delhi

RAMESH TUTHURU ,MEDAK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SANGAREDDY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad14 Sept 2018AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Smt. K.J. Divya, DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(47)Section 80C

80C of the Act.” 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, an individual, filed his return of income declaring total income of Rs. 2,12,470/-. During the assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Act, the A.O. observed that the assessee has transferred a piece of land for a sum of Rs. 40 lakhs

VITP PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE8(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 573/HYD/2024[AY 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Oct 2025
For Appellant: Advocates Percy Perdiwala andFor Respondent: : Shri Shahnawaz-ul-Rahman
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(3)Section 263Section 80Section 801A

80C to\n42[80U].\n(2) The aggregate amount of the deductions43 under this Chapter shall not, in any\ncase, exceed the gross total income of the assessee.\n44[(3) Where, in computing the total income of an association of persons or a body\nof individuals, any deduction is admissible under section 80G or section 80GGA\n45[or section 80GGC

BHARAT KUMAR BANSAL,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are\nallowed

ITA 1001/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri A Srinivas, CA
Section 153C

capital gains.\n8. The Appellate Commissioner erred in confirming the\ndisallowance of Rs. 1,88,241/-, claimed u/s.80C.\n9. Any other grounds which the Assessee may urge either\nbefore or at the time of the hearing.”\n6.\nThe brief facts common to all these appeals are that a\nsearch and seizure operation under section 132 of the Act was\nconducted