VITP PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE8(1), HYDERABAD
In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA
ITA 574/HYD/2024[AY 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Oct 2025
Bench: Shri Ravish Sood (Judicial Member), Shri Madhusudan Sawdia (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Advocates Percy Perdiwala and Mahima GoudFor Respondent: : Shri Shahnawaz-ul-Rahman
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263Section 43(6)Section 80I
capital gain and income from other sources aggregating to Rs.8,54,52,625/-. After considering the submissions filed by the assessee, the Ld. PCIT concluded that both the issues were not examined by the Ld. AO during scrutiny assessment, hence treated the order of the Ld. AO as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Accordingly, vide order