BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 801Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai54Delhi17Indore5Hyderabad4Jaipur3Jodhpur3Pune2Lucknow1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 45(3)9Section 1486Section 115J3Section 10A3Section 483Section 1473Section 151(2)3Capital Gains3Survey u/s 133A3

SAI TEJA CONSTRUCTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 877/HYD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Oct 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri KPRR Murthy, CIT(DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 151(2)Section 45(3)Section 48

capital gain for the year under consideration and thereby confirming the addition of Rs.4.80 crores made by the assessee. Accordingly, the grounds of appeal 3 raised by the assessee is dismissed. 22. So far as the additional ground raised by the assessee is concerned, the same relates to the claim of deduction u/s 80IB (10) to be allowed

Section 251(1)(a)2

SAI TEJA CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 651/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri KPRR Murthy, CIT(DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 151(2)Section 45(3)Section 48

capital gain for the year under consideration and thereby confirming the addition of Rs.4.80 crores made by the assessee. Accordingly, the grounds of appeal 3 raised by the assessee is dismissed. 22. So far as the additional ground raised by the assessee is concerned, the same relates to the claim of deduction u/s 80IB (10) to be allowed

SAI TEJA CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 652/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri KPRR Murthy, CIT(DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 151(2)Section 45(3)Section 48

capital gain for the year under consideration and thereby confirming the addition of Rs.4.80 crores made by the assessee. Accordingly, the grounds of appeal 3 raised by the assessee is dismissed. 22. So far as the additional ground raised by the assessee is concerned, the same relates to the claim of deduction u/s 80IB (10) to be allowed

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. HSBC ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1632/HYD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Aug 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vora, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 115Section 115JSection 251(1)(a)Section 37(1)Section 41(1)

capital expenditure in accordance with our observation made as above after providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Accordingly, we allow this ground of the assessee for statistical purpose. 9.5 Hence the Ground No.5 of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. 10. Ground No.6 of the assessee relates to excluding the gross amount of foreign exchange gain