BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi68Chandigarh65Indore56Surat34Ahmedabad32Pune24Jaipur19Chennai17Bangalore12Raipur10Rajkot8Mumbai8Nagpur6Patna5Agra5Kolkata4Amritsar4Cochin4Hyderabad4Dehradun4Jodhpur4Jabalpur2Cuttack2Varanasi1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 54B6Section 404Section 54F4Deduction4Section 143(3)3Section 143(2)2Section 40A(3)2Section 2(14)2Section 5482Capital Gains

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. LAKSHMI NARAYANA TURAIRAO , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 232/HYD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jul 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri Shakeer Ahmed, DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 54B

section is valid and for the prior years, the taxability would arise in the year of execution of the agreement which was in A.Y. 2004-05 in the appellant's case. Thus the first transaction of sale, even if considered a capital asset, would only be liable for taxation in A.Y. 2004- 05 and not for the years under consideration

KRISHNA KISHORE REDDY MANYAM ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(4) , HYDERABAD

2
Addition to Income2
Long Term Capital Gains2

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed\nfor statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 58/HYD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Jun 2025AY 2008-09
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 548Section 54BSection 54F

Capital Gain” (LTCG) of Rs.6,04,32,280/-\narising from the sale of agricultural lands situated at Village:\nManchirevula falling within the Rajendranagar Municipality. The\nA.O. observed that the assessee had against the LTCG of Rs.6.04\ncrore (approx.) claimed exemptions under Section 54B

AHMED ALAM KHAN,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 167/HYD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman(Virtual Hearing) & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Sashank Dundu, ARFor Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 263Section 54Section 54B

54B, 54C, 54G and 54GA of the Act. During the assessment proceedings, learned Assessing Officer by way of notice under section 143(2) of the Act, asked information relating to the sale consideration for computing capital gains

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Respondent: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakhsmi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 40a

section is very clear and the appellant has incurred the expenditure and the appellant has made the payment to the various parties and persons. The appellant has, to circumvent, not accounted for the same and has also not brought out any evidence from M/s.DLF that they have accounted for such transactions in their books as cash payments. The MoU cannot