Search: capital gains | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 548clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai150 Delhi65 Cochin57 Ahmedabad30 Indore15 Jaipur14 Bangalore14 Chandigarh12 Chennai9 Amritsar8 Nagpur8 Kolkata7 Rajkot6 Hyderabad5 Pune3 Raipur3 Jodhpur3 Surat3 Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(iii)10 Section 14A7 Section 54F7 Section 37(1)6 Section 56(2)(viia)4 Section 143(3)4 Disallowance3 Section 472 Section 143(2)2

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. LAXMI GARDENS, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 833/HYD/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad14 Mar 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Sri A. SrinivasFor Respondent: Sri K.E Sunil Babu

Section 132Section 153CSection 45Section 45(4)

gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset effected in the previous year shall, save as otherwise provided in sections 54, 548

DCIT., (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, HYDERABAD vs. SYAMA REDDY MALI REDDY, HYDERABAD

Addition to Income2

ITA 366/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Sept 2025AY 2019-20

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 54Section 54F

capital gain realized from the sale of\ncapital asset should be parted by the assessee and invested either\nin purchasing a residential house of in constructing a residential\nhouse. If the assessee has invested the money in construction of\nresidential house, merely because the construction was not\ncomplete in all respects and it was not in a fit condition

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10(1), HYDERABAD vs. VERTEX PROJECTS LLP (FORMERLY M/S VERTEX PROJECTS LTD) , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1187/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2014-15 Acit,Circle-10(1) Vs. Vertex Projects Llp Room No.515, 5Th Floor, (Formerly M/S.Vertex A-Block, I.T.Towers, Projects Ltd.) A.C.Guards, #156-159, Paigah House Hyderabad. S.P.Road, Next To Pg College. Secunderabad-500 026. Pan : Aanfv0232C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Sriram Seshadri, Ca Revenue By: Shri Rajendra Kumar,Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 15.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2023 O R D E R Per Shri Laliet Kumar, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue, Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Dated 16.03.2018 For The Ay 2014-15, On The Following Grounds :

For Appellant: Shri Sriram Seshadri, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar,CIT-DR

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 14A(3)Section 47Section 56Section 56(2)(viia)Section 56(2)(viiia)

section 147 / 148 of the Act, the coordinate Bench had held as under : “22. Coming back to our point we have to examine whether protective assessment/addition is possible under section 147 in respect of the same person and for the same period. When a regular assessment is made and later on it comes to the notice of the Assessing Officer

ALLCARGO GATI LIMITED(FORMALLY KNOWN AS GATI LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-2(2) HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

ITA 1721/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR

Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37Section 37(1)

548 Vessels & containers purchased Overseas Rs. 6,19,00,000 Investment in overseas subsidiary Companies Rs. 2,18,74,994 Total Rs.85,23,89,442” 14. It was submitted by the ld.DR that the amount was raised by the assessee for carrying out the activities which are in the nature of capital expenditure and therefore, the amount which sought

ALLCARGO GATI LIMITED(FORMALLY KNOWN AS GATI LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

ITA 190/HYD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Dec 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR

Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37Section 37(1)

548 Vessels & containers purchased Overseas Rs. 6,19,00,000 Investment in overseas subsidiary Companies Rs. 2,18,74,994 Total Rs.85,23,89,442” 14. It was submitted by the ld.DR that the amount was raised by the assessee for carrying out the activities which are in the nature of capital expenditure and therefore, the amount which sought