LADE MADWESH,KADAPA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-(2), KADAPA
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed
ITA 546/HYD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 May 2024AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.546/Hyd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Lade Madwesh Vs. Income Tax Officer Kadapa Ward-2 Pan:Aabhl5201M Kadapa (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Kumar Pal Tated, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Rahul Singhania, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 16/05/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 22/05/2024
For Appellant: Shri Kumar Pal Tated, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Rahul Singhania, DR
Section 116Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(1)Section 200ASection 206C
capital gain. The assessee filed rectification against the addition before CPC, but did not succeed in getting any relief from the CPC.
6. Aggrieved, assessee preferred appeal before the Ld.CIT(A). Ld.CIT(A) with the following observation in para no.7 & 8
of his order, sustained the addition made by CPC and dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
Page
