Search: capital gains

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi27 Mumbai15 Chennai4 Hyderabad3 Chandigarh3 Bangalore3 Pune2 Dehradun2 Kolkata2 Ahmedabad1 Cochin1 Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 1479 Section 144C(5)4 Capital Gains3 Section 1482 Section 142(1)2 Section 54F2 Section 144C(15)2 Section 144C2 Long Term Capital Gains

SRIDHAR, USA,SHREWSBURY MA, USA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 68/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shiv Sewak, CIT-DR

Section 147

section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), assessee filed this appeal, with a delay of two days. 2. At the outset, we noticed that learned AR filed an affidavit, explaining the reasons for the delay, stating that due to some technical reasons, the network was not working in his office on that

GANGARAM REDDY TEKULAPALLI,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., INT TAXN- 2, HYDERABAD

In the result appeal ITA

ITA 786/HYD/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed

SRIDHAR, USA,SHREWSBURY MA, USA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD

GANGARAM REDDY TEKULAPALLI,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., INT TAXN- 2, HYDERABAD

SRIDHAR, USA,SHREWSBURY MA, USA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD

GANGARAM REDDY TEKULAPALLI,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., INT TAXN- 2, HYDERABAD

HARIPRIYA TEKUPALLY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INT TXN - 2, HYDERABAD