BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi60Mumbai40Bangalore17Chennai14Pune7Ahmedabad5Hyderabad4Chandigarh3SC3Jaipur2Cochin2Dehradun2Karnataka2Kolkata2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 1479Section 144C(5)4Capital Gains3Section 1482Section 142(1)2Section 54F2Section 144C(15)2Section 144C2Section 2112

SRI RAMADAS PAPER BOARDS (P) LTD., HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1514/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2012-13 Sri Ramadas Paper Boards (P) Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Ltd., Hyderabad. Tax, Circle – 3(2), Hyderabad. Pan – Aadcs2140M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. HariFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 211

35A; or (iv) the amount of expenditure of a capital nature' referred to in clause (ix) of sub-section (1) of section 36; or ' (v) the cost of acquisition of a capital asset (not being a capital asset referred to in section 50) for the purposes of section 48, and the amount arrived at after such addition or deduction shall

Long Term Capital Gains2
Addition to Income2
Survey u/s 133A2

SRIDHAR, USA,SHREWSBURY MA, USA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 68/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shiv Sewak, CIT-DR
Section 147

section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), assessee filed this appeal, with a delay of two days. 2. At the outset, we noticed that learned AR filed an affidavit, explaining the reasons for the delay, stating that due to some technical reasons, the network was not working in his office on that

HARIPRIYA TEKUPALLY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INT TXN - 2, HYDERABAD

In the result appeal ITA

ITA 787/HYD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: CA, P R SureshFor Respondent: Sri Siva Prasad, SV, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144CSection 144C(15)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 54F

capital gains” by the Assessing Officer, the assessee has opted for filing objections before the 5 ITA.Nos.786 & 787/Hyd./2024 Disputes Resolution Panel [in short “DRP”], Bangalore vide application dated 26.04.2023. The DRP after hearing the objections of the assessee, was of the opinion that the assessee ought to have file his objections against each such proposed variations

GANGARAM REDDY TEKULAPALLI,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., INT TAXN- 2, HYDERABAD

In the result appeal ITA

ITA 786/HYD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: CA, P R SureshFor Respondent: Sri Siva Prasad, SV, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144CSection 144C(15)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 54F

capital gains” by the Assessing Officer, the assessee has opted for filing objections before the 5 ITA.Nos.786 & 787/Hyd./2024 Disputes Resolution Panel [in short “DRP”], Bangalore vide application dated 26.04.2023. The DRP after hearing the objections of the assessee, was of the opinion that the assessee ought to have file his objections against each such proposed variations