BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “capital gains”+ Section 276clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi381Mumbai325Bangalore128Karnataka110Jaipur77Ahmedabad73Kolkata62Chennai51Hyderabad36Indore35Chandigarh20Calcutta17Nagpur11Visakhapatnam11SC10Amritsar10Pune8Guwahati7Raipur5Surat5Telangana5Rajkot5Jodhpur3Rajasthan3Cochin2Cuttack2Lucknow2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Agra1Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Orissa1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 14881Capital Gains27Section 2(14)26Survey u/s 133A26Section 133A25Section 80P(2)(a)9Addition to Income8Section 143(2)6Section 143(3)

BANDA MALLESH (HUF), R.R.DIST,HYDERGUDA VILLAGE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 928/HYD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU ASHOK (HUF),,HYDERABAD vs. ASST.CIT, CIRCLE -8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

5
Section 80P4
Section 54F4
Deduction3
ITA 60/HYD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

LATE. DAPPU YADAIAH(HUF), (REPRESENTED BY DAPPU ASHOK BROTHER AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE),HYDERABAD vs. ASST.CIT, CIRCLE -8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 59/HYD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU NARASIMHA ( SMALLER HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1544/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU PADMA (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1542/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

KONDE SANDAIAH (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1540/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU BABU RAO (HUF), R.R.DIST,HYDERGUDA VILLAGE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 929/HYD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

KONDE NARASIMHA (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1590/HYD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

SRI JILAKARA NARASIMHA, R.R. DIST,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE -8(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 54/HYD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

MALI CHANDRASEKHAR (HUF), R.R. DISTRICT,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 913/HYD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

MALI NARASIMHA (HUF), R.R. DISTRICT,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 914/HYD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU NARASIMHA (HUF), RR DIST,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 915/HYD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

KONDE ANJAIAH (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1539/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

KONDE MALLESH(HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1541/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU RAMULU (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1543/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU NARASIMHA ( LARGER HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1545/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

DAPPU NAVEEN KUMAR (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1546/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

KONDE SRISAILAM (HUF),,HYDERABAD vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF IT CIRCLE -8(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 1605/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

JILKARA CHINNA SATAIAH (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. ASST.CIT,CIRCLE - 8(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 209/HYD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8(1),, HYDERABAD vs. SRI DAPPU ASHOK (HUF),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 36/HYD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal &
Section 133ASection 148Section 2(14)

capital gain to tax in their individual returns and claimed eligible exemptions u/s 54F and 54B. He also submitted that pursuant to the agreement of sale-cum-GPA, sale consideration has been paid directly to each of the individual owners separately and, therefore, it is established that each of the owner is the absolute owner of the property and there