Search: capital gains

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 244Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai157 Delhi91 Jaipur28 Bangalore26 Ahmedabad25 Cochin21 Kolkata15 Chandigarh8 Visakhapatnam5 Dehradun5 Hyderabad5 Chennai4 Indore4 Lucknow3 Karnataka3 Pune3 Rajkot2 Guwahati1 Amritsar1 Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 548 Section 1444 Section 201(1)4 Section 1954 Deduction4 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Survey u/s 133A3 Capital Gains3

TEKSYSTEMS GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed as directed above

ITA 290/HYD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Ms. Amulya K. ARFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR

Section 32

capital gains in the hands of the seller, the said transaction cannot be doubted in the hands of the purchaser. These decisions bind us. 14. Viewing from any angle, the circumstances cited by the authorities to hold that the BTA is a colourable device created only to reduce the tax, does not hold water. We, therefore, while disagreeing with

KAMLESH RANKA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTL. TAXATION-II, , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

TEKSYSTEMS GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

KAMLESH RANKA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTL. TAXATION-II, , HYDERABAD

TEKSYSTEMS GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

KAMLESH RANKA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTL. TAXATION-II, , HYDERABAD

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, ANANTAPUR vs. AMELINANE RAVINDRA CHOWDARY, ANANTAPUR

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, ANANTAPUR vs. AMELINANE RAVINDRA CHOWDARY, ANANTAPUR

ADIT(IT)-I,, HYDERABAD vs. M/S KAMINENI HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED,, HYDERABAD