LADE MADWESH,KADAPA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-(2), KADAPA
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed
ITA 546/HYD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 May 2024AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.546/Hyd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Lade Madwesh Vs. Income Tax Officer Kadapa Ward-2 Pan:Aabhl5201M Kadapa (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Kumar Pal Tated, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Rahul Singhania, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 16/05/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 22/05/2024
For Appellant: Shri Kumar Pal Tated, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Rahul Singhania, DR
Section 116Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 154(1)Section 200ASection 206C
200A;
(d) amend any intimation under sub-section (1) of section 206CB.”
10. From perusal of above it is absolutely clear that any mistake which is apparent from record can only be rectified u/s 154 of the Act. Further Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of T. S.
Balaram, Income Tax vs M/S. Volkart Brothers, Bombay on 5
August
