BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 144B(1)(xvi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur9Delhi9Chandigarh7Mumbai7Hyderabad4Visakhapatnam1Chennai1Lucknow1Nagpur1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 2633Addition to Income3Natural Justice3Condonation of Delay3Section 2502Section 22Section 144B2Section 692

HIMASAGAR KRISHNA MUTHAPPAGARI,TIRUPATI vs. ITO., WARD-2(3), TIRUPATI

ITA 687/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us.

For Appellant: Shri M. Uday Teja, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

capital gain disclosed by the assessee was examined twice by the Assessing Officer; and (ii) that the purported revision of the assessment order based on an audit objection was not permitted under law; but neither of the same found favor with the revisional authority. Apart from that, it was the assessee's claim that as he 6 Himsagar Krishna

KRISHNAKUMAR MANDA,MEDCHAL vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-12(1), HYDERABAD

Section 1472
House Property2
Unexplained Investment2
ITA 1017/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed
ITAT Hyderabad
19 Dec 2025
AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 1016 & 1017/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2021-22) Shri Krishnakumar Manda, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Medchal Income Tax Pan:Bmspm9739D Circle 12(1) Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Phaneendra Nag, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 11/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 19/12/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Phaneendra Nag, CAFor Respondent: : Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 2Section 250Section 69

xvi) & (xviii) of Sub section 2 of Section 144B i.e. in not serving the Draft assessment order along with Show Cause notice before finalizing the assessment, which would amount to breach of not only Principles of Natural Justice but also of the action in complete disregard to the Statutory Provision. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to appreciate the fact

KRISHNAKUMAR MANDA,MEDCHAL vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-12(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1016/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 1016 & 1017/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2021-22) Shri Krishnakumar Manda, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Medchal Income Tax Pan:Bmspm9739D Circle 12(1) Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Phaneendra Nag, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 11/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 19/12/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Phaneendra Nag, CAFor Respondent: : Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 2Section 250Section 69

xvi) & (xviii) of Sub section 2 of Section 144B i.e. in not serving the Draft assessment order along with Show Cause notice before finalizing the assessment, which would amount to breach of not only Principles of Natural Justice but also of the action in complete disregard to the Statutory Provision. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to appreciate the fact

BENU NETWORKS PACKET SWITCH PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1 (2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 86/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. & आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.86/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Benu Networks Packet Switch Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1) Private Ltd, Hyderabad Hydrabad Pan:Aaecb4902B (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Ashish Jain, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri B Balakrishna, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 13/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 25/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Jain, CAFor Respondent: : Shri B Balakrishna, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92B

144B of the I.T. Act, 1961 in pursuant to the directions of the DRP dated 7/12/2021 passed u/s 144C(5) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for the A.Y 2017-18. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “Ground No.1 The learned TPO grossly erred in conducting independent search in wrongly applying the proviso below Rule