KHAIRUNNISA,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(3), HYDERABAD
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 24/HYD/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Jan 2024AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2009-10 Khairunnisa, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, R/O.8-5-85, Ward 11(3), Road No.1, Hyderabad. Mallikarjuna Colony, Bowenpally, Secunderabad. Pan : Anvpk4801B. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Ms. Sandhya, Advocate, Appeared Through Virtual Mode. Revenue By: Shri Rohit Mujumdar, Sr.A.R, Appeared Through Virtual Mode. Date Of Hearing: 24/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 24/01/2024
For Appellant: Ms. Sandhya, Advocate, appeared through virtual modeFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar, Sr.A.R, appeared through virtual mode
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 234BSection 54F
capital gains. Hence, notice u/s 148 of the Act dt.16.03.2016 was issued and served on 17.03.2016. As there was no response from the assessee, again notices u/s 142(1) of the Act were issued from time to time. As the assessment was getting barred by limitation of time by 31.12.2016
and due to assessee’s non-compliance, Assessing Officer finally