Search: capital gains | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai120 Delhi16 Pune9 Kolkata8 Chennai7 Bangalore6 Hyderabad4 Jaipur4 Surat3 Nagpur3 Indore2 Ahmedabad2 Rajkot2 Agra1 Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 2637 Section 143(3)5 Section 10(38)4 Section 111A3 Disallowance3 Exemption2 Addition to Income2 Set Off of Losses2

PENNAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee company is partly allowed/partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 832/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Us:

Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gains under Section 111A of the Act. Thereafter, the AO framed the assessment vide his order passed under Section

TARUN KUMAR GOYAL (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2093/HYD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Mrs. M. Narmada, CIT-DR

Section 10(38)Section 111ASection 143(3)

Gain (LTCG) on shares”. 3. It could be seen from the record that the assessee claimed an exemption under section 10(38) of the Act for the LTCG earned from selling shares of M/s. Kailash Auto Finance Limited (KAFL), a listed company. The total sale amount for the KAFL shares was 38,10,750/-, and the assessee

TARUN KUMAR GOYAL (HUF) ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 455/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Mrs. M. Narmada, CIT-DR

Section 10(38)Section 111ASection 143(3)

Gain (LTCG) on shares”. 3. It could be seen from the record that the assessee claimed an exemption under section 10(38) of the Act for the LTCG earned from selling shares of M/s. Kailash Auto Finance Limited (KAFL), a listed company. The total sale amount for the KAFL shares was 38,10,750/-, and the assessee

REEMA AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 353/HYD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: \nDr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR

Section 111ASection 139(1)

111A of the Income\nTax Act, 1961.\n9. The Id CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that the AO has\nnot doubted the purchase of shares in D-MAT Form agency, hence\nsale cannot be bogus.\n10. The Id CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that the sale\ntransaction between the appellant and the other party