BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai54Delhi30Bangalore11Pune8Kolkata7Ahmedabad6Indore5Jaipur5Hyderabad3Chennai2Surat1

Key Topics

Section 80G8Section 14A6Section 143(3)5Section 801A4Section 684Section 92C4Transfer Pricing3Section 144B2Section 802

BS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST.COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2186/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Manmohan & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Deepak P. Ripote
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 92B

TP study conducted by assessee: The assessee has carried out the economic analysis and has summarized it as under: Nature of Amount (Rs.) MAM PLI Margin of Margin of international assessee compalrable transaction Investment 12,68,25,000/- - - - - in subsidiary Corporate 13,58,87,500/- - - - - Guarantee M/s BS Ltd., Hyd. 2.4 Analysis of the Transaction: As per the audited statement

Deduction2
Disallowance2
Addition to Income2

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1084/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Sourabh Soparkar, Advocate Represented by Department : Dr. Narendra Kumar NFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR Date of Conclusion of Hearing : 11/11/2025
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

TP Nos. 145 & 482/Hyd/2022) that, coming to the Income Tax Act, 1961, there is no express provision to support the contention of Revenue. On the other hand, section 80G(2)(iiihk) and (iiihl) of the Act expressly provide that such sums donated for Swatch Bharath Kosh and Clean Ganga Fund shall be the amounts other than the sums spent

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1083/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

TP Nos. 145 &\n482/Hyd/2022) that, coming to the Income Tax Act, 1961, there is no\nexpress provision to support the contention of Revenue. On the other\nhand, section 80G(2)(iiihk) and (iiihl) of the Act expressly provide that\nsuch sums donated for Swatch Bharath Kosh and Clean Ganga Fund\nshall be the amounts other than the sums spent