Search: bogus purchases

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 391clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi164 Mumbai119 Karnataka99 Jaipur44 Ahmedabad28 Chandigarh24 Chennai22 Bangalore22 Indore19 Kolkata12 Surat6 Lucknow5 Allahabad3 Pune3 Rajkot2 Hyderabad2 Raipur1 Agra1 Guwahati1 Amritsar1 Panaji1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 92B2

BS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST.COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2186/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Manmohan & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Deepak P. Ripote

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 92B

section 40A. Instead of rejecting the turnover, he proceeded to disallow only the associated financial cost. He disallowed the interest cost in proportion to the purchases with related and unrelated parties. 17.2 However, DRP remitted this issue of disallowance of interest back to the AO to recalculate the interest properly and by following cash flow on day to day basis

BS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST.COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

BS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST.COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

REEMA AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD