BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai45Ahmedabad38Delhi26Jaipur20Kolkata18Chandigarh12Hyderabad12Guwahati11Jodhpur9Raipur7Bangalore6Chennai4Indore3Surat2Lucknow2Cuttack1Pune1Allahabad1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 10A48Section 13212Deduction12Addition to Income12Search & Seizure12

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 831/HYD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 832/HYD/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 834/HYD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 836/HYD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 864/HYD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 865/HYD/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 867/HYD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 833/HYD/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 835/HYD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 866/HYD/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 868/HYD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 869/HYD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

VA, USA (VLS) but never recruited any manpower to the said organization or any other person either in USA or in India. The assessee also furnished various details of various software developed by it and supplied to VLS. 3.5. Regarding higher margin, the assessee submitted that the companies listed by the AO in the assessment order are into software services