Search: bogus purchases

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 270Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai37 Ahmedabad20 Rajkot19 Delhi18 Guwahati16 Jaipur13 Surat9 Nagpur7 Indore5 Pune4 Chennai3 Hyderabad2 Lucknow2 Chandigarh2 Kolkata1 Patna1 Jodhpur1 Bangalore1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 133(6)2 Section 142(1)2 Bogus Purchases2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2 Limitation/Time-bar2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 17(1), HYDERABAD vs. MAHALAKSHMI LABORATORIES PVT LTD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 606/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Oct 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Y.V. Bhanu Narayan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)

Section 133(6) were sent to 4 Mahalakshmi Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. various suppliers. Further, notice u/s 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued on 26.07.2022. After availing various opportunities, finally assessee had responded to the notices with the required details. Assessing Officer after verification of the reply submitted by the assessee found that the assessee had taken

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 17(1), HYDERABAD vs. MAHALAKSHMI LABORATORIES PVT LTD, HYDERABAD

MAHALAKSHMI LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 17(1), HYDERABAD vs. MAHALAKSHMI LABORATORIES PVT LTD, HYDERABAD

MAHALAKSHMI LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD