Search: bogus purchases

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 270clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai131 Delhi69 Chennai38 Jaipur33 Ahmedabad19 Allahabad19 Guwahati17 Kolkata14 Visakhapatnam14 Indore13 Bangalore12 Pune12 Chandigarh10 Hyderabad6 Surat6 Raipur5 Rajkot5 Amritsar3 Lucknow3 Nagpur2 Agra2 Patna1 Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 69B9 Section 40A(3)6 Section 115B6 Section 234A6 Section 153A6 Addition to Income6 Section 143(3)4 Section 404 Section 683

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Respondent: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakhsmi, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 40a

bogus. The findings of the ld. CIT(A) on this issue are incorrect. 11. The ld.CIT(A) erred in sustaining the disallowance of Rs.8,41,87,239/- made by the Assessing Officer by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 12. The Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition of Rs.18,47,25,000 made

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

KANISHKA GUPTA,,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

RONAK GUPTA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

SUPREME AGRO,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 (1), HYDERABAD

FARMAX INDIA LIMITED,,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(3), HYDERABAD

DCIT, CIRCLE-17(1),HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. FARMAX INDIA LTD., HYD, R.R.DIST