BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 153Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai172Delhi93Jaipur68Cochin57Bangalore36Chennai34Amritsar33Chandigarh23Guwahati22Allahabad17Visakhapatnam16Ahmedabad15Kolkata15Hyderabad14Nagpur6Pune6Dehradun5Lucknow5Surat4Raipur2Indore1Jodhpur1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 153B74Section 292C24Addition to Income14Section 153A12Section 2(31)12Limitation/Time-bar12Section 143(3)4Section 69A2Section 37(1)2

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1128/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1091/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed
Section 1322
Disallowance2
Search & Seizure2
ITAT Hyderabad
27 Mar 2026
AY 2016-17
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1093/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1090/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1089/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2014-15
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1129/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1095/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1092/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1094/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2019-20
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1126/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1125/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1127/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
Section 153ASection 153BSection 2(31)Section 292C

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

R.K.INFRACORP PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 363/HYD/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Feb 2026AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.235/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year:2020-21) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. R.K. Infracorp Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Hyderabad. (Appellant) Private Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaecr0071P (Respondent) निर्धारिती द्वारा /Assessee By: Shri M V Prasad, Ca राजस्व द्वारा / Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit-Dr (Hybrid Mode) आ.अपी. सं/Ita No.363/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year:2020-21) M/S. R.K. Infracorp Private Vs. Deputy Commissioner Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaecr0071P (Appellant) निर्धारिती द्वारा / Assessee By: राजस्व द्वारा / Revenue By: Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Hyderabad. (Respondent) Shri M V Prasad, Ca Shri K. Vinoth Kannan, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing: 07/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of 25/02/2026 Pronouncement: 2

For Appellant: Shri M V Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153BSection 37(1)Section 69A

purchasers." Apart from that, the assessee company has raised the following additional ground of appeal: "Ground No.5: "On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned CIT(Appeals) is not justified to holding that the assessment completed by the Learned Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) was made within the time as prescribed in the Section 153B

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. R.K.INFRACORP PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 235/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.235/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year:2020-21) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. R.K. Infracorp Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Hyderabad. (Appellant) Private Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaecr0071P (Respondent) निर्धारिती द्वारा /Assessee By: Shri M V Prasad, Ca राजस्व द्वारा / Revenue By: | Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit-Dr (Hybrid Mode) आ.अपी. सं/Ita No.363/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year:2020-21) M/S. R.K. Infracorp Private Vs. Deputy Commissioner Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaecr0071P (Appellant) Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Hyderabad. (Respondent) निर्धारिती द्वारा / Assessee By: Shri M V Prasad, Ca राजस्व द्वारा / Revenue By: Shri K. Vinoth Kannan, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing: 07/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of 25/02/2026 Pronouncement: 2

For Appellant: Shri M V Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153BSection 37(1)Section 69A

purchasers." Apart from that, the assessee company has raised the following additional ground of appeal: "Ground No.5: "On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned CIT(Appeals) is not justified to holding that the assessment completed by the Learned Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) was made within the time as prescribed in the Section 153B