PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, we quash the assessment order passed by the A.O. for A.Y. 2014-15 to 2020-21. 22. The next issue that came up for our consideration is with respect to addition made by the A.O. towards cash sheets found in the email account of Shri

R.K.INFRACORP PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

bogus purchases in its books of accounts. The\nAO, based on his aforesaid observations, which though were explicitly\nrecorded only in context of the aforementioned three entries, however\ndrew adverse inferences with respect to 24 entries mentioned in the\nseized document, viz., Annexure A-1/Pages 01-02 and made an addition\nof Rs.20,35,50,000/- by treating

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. R.K.INFRACORP PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

bogus purchases in its books of accounts. The\nAO, based on his aforesaid observations, which though were explicitly\nrecorded only in context of the aforementioned three entries, however\ndrew adverse inferences with respect to 24 entries mentioned in the\nseized document, viz., Annexure A-1/Pages 01-02 and made an addition\nof Rs.20,35,50,000/- by treating