BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 120(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai257Delhi124Cochin57Jaipur49Bangalore48Kolkata32Chandigarh29Chennai26Ahmedabad26Raipur21Rajkot18Surat18Indore18Visakhapatnam10Jodhpur10Guwahati9Pune9Lucknow7Varanasi5Cuttack5Hyderabad4Patna3Allahabad3Amritsar2Jabalpur1Dehradun1Agra1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 80G8Section 14A6Section 143(3)5Section 801A4Section 684Section 92C4Section 54F4Addition to Income4Disallowance3

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1084/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Sourabh Soparkar, Advocate Represented by Department : Dr. Narendra Kumar NFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR Date of Conclusion of Hearing : 11/11/2025
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

120/-, and “book profit” under Section 115JB of the Act of Rs. 230,21,15,364/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee company was selected for complete scrutiny under the E-assessment Scheme, 2019, on various issues, viz. business purchases, deduction claimed under section 801A, and expenses incurred for earning exempt income. 33. Thereafter, the AO vide his order passed

Section 1472
Transfer Pricing2
Deduction2

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1083/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 68Section 80Section 801ASection 80GSection 92C

120/-, and “book profit” under\nSection 115JB of the Act of Rs. 230,21,15,364/-. Subsequently, the\ncase of the assessee company was selected for complete scrutiny\nunder the E-assessment Scheme, 2019, on various issues, viz.\nbusiness purchases, deduction claimed under section 801A, and\nexpenses incurred for earning exempt income.\n33. Thereafter, the AO vide his order passed

DCIT., CIRCLE-2(1), HYDRABAD vs. KALPTARU INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal ITA

ITA 1077/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Mar 2026AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Sri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 147

5 | GBPNOV2013 | 20- 03- 2013 | 350 | 3,00,72,875.00 | 350 | 3,10,45,000.00 | 9,72,125.00 |\n| 6 | GBPNOV2013 | 20- 03- 2013 | 120 | 1,03,05,600.00 | 120 | 1,06,34,700.00 | 3,29,100.00 |\n| 7 | USDDEC13C58 | 21- 03- 2013 | 2,500 | 17,50,000.00 | 2,500 | 42,00,000.00 | 24,50,000.00 |\n| Grand total

RACHIT V SHAH,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-7(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 420/HYD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Kumar Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Adithya for Shri K.P.R.R.Murthy, Sr.AR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 54F

5 Rachit v. Shah a colourable device to claim exemption u/s 54F of the Act. Therefore, the ground of the appellant is dismissed. 6. Feeling aggrieved by the order of the ld.CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us on the grounds mentioned hereinabove. 7. The Ld.AR had made the following submissions before us. Firstly, it was submitted that