BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 9(1)(vb)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh48Delhi4Hyderabad3Surat2Mumbai2Bangalore1Pune1Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 408Section 40A(3)4Section 80I4Deduction3TDS3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 194A2Section 194C2Section 69C2

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -3 (1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 104/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, ARFor Respondent: Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 92CSection 92E

TDS to the tune of Rs. 30,211/- without assigning any reasons therefor. 10. The appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any of the grounds during the course of hearing.” 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee-company is engaged in manufacturing of Clinker and Ordinary Portland Cement. The assessee, being the third largest cement

Section 372
Section 139(5)2

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD vs. IL & FS ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTIONS CO. LIMITED , HYDERABAD

ITA 129/HYD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2026AY 2008-09
Section 139(5)Section 194ASection 194CSection 37Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 69C

VB is in excess of limit prescribed\nfor application of section 194C and further the appellant has failed\nto file relevant details substantiating its argument that the third\nparty had paid the amount to the contractor, in our considered\nview, the A.O. has rightly disallowed transportation charges u/s\n194C of the Act. The Ld.CIT(A), after considering relevant facts

IL & FS ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED(FORMERLY MAYTAS INFRA LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-9, HYDERABAD

ITA 1886/HYD/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2026AY 2008-09
Section 139(5)Section 194ASection 194CSection 37Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 69C

VB is in excess of limit prescribed\nfor application of section 194C and further the appellant has failed\nto file relevant details substantiating its argument that the third\nparty had paid the amount to the contractor, in our considered\nview, the A.O. has rightly disallowed transportation charges u/s\n194C of the Act. The Ld.CIT(A), after considering relevant facts