THOTA RAMAIAH L/R T VASUNDHARA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

80C and Rs.5,90,00,000/- under section 40A(3) of the Act. 4. Feeling aggrieved with the order passed by the assessing officer, assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who granted partial relief to the assessee. 5. Aggrieved with the order of ld.CIT(A), assessee is now in appeal before us. 6. Before us, ld. AR filed

KONATHAM KOTIREDDY,WARANGAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, WARANGAL

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

TDS deducted u/sec.194H\ncorroborates the claim of the assessee as reflected from the\nbank account statement that the assessee is receiving only\nthe commission income from M/s. Anika Bajaj, Warangal.\nFurther, the assessee has also given the entire details and\ntotal commission income received during the year which is\nalso matching with Form-26AS. Thus, the income of the\nassessee

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

80C, 80D, etc.) exceeds the permissible limit. ITA No.912/Hyd/2024 18 5. Mismatch in Income & Form 26AS/TDS Details - Any inconsistency between the income reported and the details in Form 26AS, AIS, or TDS certificates may be adjusted. 6. Disallowance of Exempt Income - If any income claimed as exempt does not meet the required conditions. 7. Mismatch in Tax Payments - Adjustments