BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai21Jaipur17Delhi17Cochin15Bangalore12Ahmedabad11Kolkata10Lucknow8Raipur6Chandigarh6Pune6Indore5Chennai5Amritsar3Hyderabad3Visakhapatnam2Nagpur1Allahabad1Rajkot1Varanasi1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)6Section 80C5Section 40A(3)5Section 143(3)4Section 80T3Addition to Income3Section 92C2Deduction2Disallowance2

SANGEETA AKKARAJU CHANDRASEKHAR,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-14(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1076/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed An Affidavit In Support Of The Condonation Petition, Wherein She Has Mentioned The Reasons For The Delay & Submitted That The Delay Occurred Due To Factors Beyond Her Control, With No Deliberate Intention To Defer The Filing Of The Appeal. On The Other Hand, The Learned Senior A.R. For The Revenue, Shri Mathivanan, S.A. Did Not Strongly Oppose The Condonation Of Delay Petition Filed By The Assessee.

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 80CSection 80T

TDS under Section 194A on interest income amounts to Rs. 5,50,967/- and purchase of immovable property under (SFT-012) amounts to Rs. 2,71,48,800/-. Therefore, the assessment has been reopened under Section 147 of the Act, and a notice under Section 148, along with reasons for reopening and a notice under Section

THOTA RAMAIAH L/R T VASUNDHARA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1626/HYD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Somnath GhoshFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Adithya, Sr.A.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)Section 80C

80C and Rs.5,90,00,000/- under section 40A(3) of the Act. 4. Feeling aggrieved with the order passed by the assessing officer, assessee filed appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who granted partial relief to the assessee. 5. Aggrieved with the order of ld.CIT(A), assessee is now in appeal before us. 6. Before us, ld. AR filed

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 912/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao & ShriFor Respondent: Shri Narender Kumar Naik
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 92C

80C, 80D, etc.) exceeds the permissible limit. ITA No.912/Hyd/2024 18 5. Mismatch in Income & Form 26AS/TDS Details - Any inconsistency between the income reported and the details in Form 26AS, AIS, or TDS certificates may be adjusted. 6. Disallowance of Exempt Income - If any income claimed as exempt does not meet the required conditions. 7. Mismatch in Tax Payments - Adjustments