BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

108 results for “TDS”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi797Mumbai563Bangalore248Chennai215Karnataka121Chandigarh111Hyderabad108Ahmedabad92Kolkata86Cochin64Jaipur58Raipur46Lucknow28Indore25Pune22Rajkot21Cuttack19Visakhapatnam18Ranchi16Guwahati14Nagpur12Dehradun11Jodhpur11Surat10Patna7Agra6Kerala5SC5Varanasi5Telangana2Calcutta2Panaji2Jabalpur2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 153C157Section 13282Addition to Income68Search & Seizure54Section 6941Section 139(1)41Section 6836Section 4019Section 143(3)16TDS

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10(1), HYDERABAD vs. VERTEX PROJECTS LLP (FORMERLY M/S VERTEX PROJECTS LTD) , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1187/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2014-15 Acit,Circle-10(1) Vs. Vertex Projects Llp Room No.515, 5Th Floor, (Formerly M/S.Vertex A-Block, I.T.Towers, Projects Ltd.) A.C.Guards, #156-159, Paigah House Hyderabad. S.P.Road, Next To Pg College. Secunderabad-500 026. Pan : Aanfv0232C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Sriram Seshadri, Ca Revenue By: Shri Rajendra Kumar,Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 15.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.04.2023 O R D E R Per Shri Laliet Kumar, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue, Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Dated 16.03.2018 For The Ay 2014-15, On The Following Grounds :

For Appellant: Shri Sriram Seshadri, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar,CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 14A(3)Section 47

Showing 1–20 of 108 · Page 1 of 6

14
Section 153A13
Disallowance12
Section 56
Section 56(2)(viia)
Section 56(2)(viiia)

vii) deal with transfer of shares pursuant to scheme of amalgamation. The above are specific and are not explicitly covered by the definition of amalgamation as the section 2(lB). There is no mention of the provision 47(vi) and 47(vib) which is amalgamation and demerger as they include all capital assets including no doubt shares from the purview

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. Y S JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, KADAPA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee is\nallowed

ITA 670/HYD/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Feb 2025AY 2011-12
For Appellant: \nShri C.A.Vijay Mehta, ARFor Respondent: \nMs.M.Narmada, CIT-DR and
Section 132Section 56(1)(vii)

TDS” and accordingly notice u/s 143(2) of Income Tax Act,\n1961 (“the Act”) dated 08.09.2012 was issued and served on the\nassessee on 13.09.2012 by the DCIT, Circle-2(3), Hyderabad.\nSubsequently, as per action plan of the Board, the case was\npicked up by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-\n2, Hyderabad for completion of scrutiny assessment

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1224/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1887/HYD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FOODS FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 796/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1223/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1173/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1175/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1174/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1669/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 202/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1222/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 214/HYD/2018[2009/10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1176/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1177/HYD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMTED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1670/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 68

56(2)(vii)(a) of the Act, cash credit under section 68 of the Act and interest income. Learned Assessing Officer made an addition on account of business income by estimating the same at 15% of the gross receipts keeping in view the line of business of the assessee and also that there are certain deficiencies in making huge cash

ARKAMITRA REALTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ,VIJAYAWADA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1662/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

Section 132Section 153C

TDS claim is Rs.88, 77,780/- only. In view thereof, the Assessing Officer is directed to adopt the revised working, as per remand report, for calculation of the Fair Market Value of the shares and calculate the deemed income u/s.56(2)(viia)(ii) accordingly. In the result, the grounds related to this issue are PARTLY ALLOWED.” 7. Aggrieved with such

BUDHAPALITA TIMBER ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED ,VIJAYAWADA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1665/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

Section 132Section 153C

TDS claim is Rs.88, 77,780/- only. In view thereof, the Assessing Officer is directed to adopt the revised working, as per remand report, for calculation of the Fair Market Value of the shares and calculate the deemed income u/s.56(2)(viia)(ii) accordingly. In the result, the grounds related to this issue are PARTLY ALLOWED.” 7. Aggrieved with such

GREENWOOD INFRACON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,VIJAYAWADA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1661/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

Section 132Section 153C

TDS claim is Rs.88, 77,780/- only. In view thereof, the Assessing Officer is directed to adopt the revised working, as per remand report, for calculation of the Fair Market Value of the shares and calculate the deemed income u/s.56(2)(viia)(ii) accordingly. In the result, the grounds related to this issue are PARTLY ALLOWED.” 7. Aggrieved with such

AMRUTHA AGRO ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1674/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

Section 132Section 153C

TDS claim is Rs.88, 77,780/- only. In view thereof, the Assessing Officer is directed to adopt the revised working, as per remand report, for calculation of the Fair Market Value of the shares and calculate the deemed income u/s.56(2)(viia)(ii) accordingly. In the result, the grounds related to this issue are PARTLY ALLOWED.” 7. Aggrieved with such