BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai76Delhi49Bangalore13Chennai11Ahmedabad11Guwahati9Jaipur8Chandigarh8Kolkata8Hyderabad5Indore4Lucknow4Surat4Agra3Nagpur3Pune3Rajkot2Jodhpur2Jabalpur2Visakhapatnam2Amritsar2Raipur1Patna1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 50C16Section 1476Section 143(2)4Section 1483TDS3Section 1392Section 143(1)2Section 2632

JUSTICE. B.SUBASHAN REDDY (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1680/HYD/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Jul 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri A.Srinivas, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, DR
Section 50C

TDS rights and the amount of Rs. 46,22,878/- receivable by the assessees in future from the Government. (xii) For the aforesaid reasons, the provisions of the section 50C

SMT.B.RATNA ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1681/HYD/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad
22 Jul 2020
AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri A.Srinivas, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, DR
Section 50C

TDS rights and the amount of Rs. 46,22,878/- receivable by the assessees in future from the Government. (xii) For the aforesaid reasons, the provisions of the section 50C

SRI VENKATESWARA COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 471/HYD/2023[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Hyderabad21 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2012-13 Sri Venkateswara Vs. Income Tax Officer Cooperative House Ward 14(2) Building Society Ltd, Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aaeas7809L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: N O N E Revenue By: Smt. Sheetal Sarin, Dr Date Of Hearing: 21/12/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 21/12/2023 Order Per R.K. Panda, Vice-This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Ex-Parte Order Dated 3.08.2023 Of The Learned Cit (A)-Nfac Delhi, Relating To A.Y.2012-13. 2. This Appeal Was Fixed For Hearing On 6.11.2023 For Which Notice Was Duly Served On The Assessee Through Rpad & The Acknowledgment Is Placed On Record. However, None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee At The Time Of Hearing Nor Any Page 1 Of 6

For Appellant: N O N EFor Respondent: Smt. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 147Section 148Section 45Section 50C

TDS during the financial year 2011-12 relevant to A.Y 2012-13. He further noticed that the assessee sold the property at MLA Colony, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad admeasuring 150 Sq. Yards for Rs.7,50,000/-. However, the value adopted by the SRO for charging stamp duty was Rs.60,00,000/-. According to the Assessing Officer although the assessee

YERRAM VENKATA SUBBA REDDY ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-14(1), HYDERABAD

In the result assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1119/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Rajendra Kumar, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 32(1)Section 43(6)Section 50C

TDS. She further observed that the following points were not considered by the A.O. "(i) A perusal of profit and loss account revealed that the assessee has claimed an amount of Rs. 8,95,97,600/- as ‘loss on sale of shares'. This loss should be treated as ‘loss from capital gains', as the assessee is in the business

VENU GOPAL KARAVADI, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-4(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeal filed by Assessee is allowed

ITA 202/HYD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B. Ramakotaiahassessment Year: 2009-10 Shri Venu Gopal Karavadi, Vs. Ito, Hyderabad. Ward – 4(2), Hyderabad. Pan- Bdbpk1736J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K.A Sai Prasad Shri B. Suresh Babu Revenue By : Date Of Hearing : 25-04-2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27-04-2018 Order Per Shri B. Ramakotaiah, Am: This Is An Appeal By Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-1, Hyderabad Dated 06.10.2016. Apart From The Issues Originally Contested In Appeal I.E Addition U/S Sec. 68 Of The It Act Of Two Deposits Of Rs. 4.45 Lakhs & Rs. 7.5 Laksh In Two Banks, Assessee Also Raised The Additional Grounds That Initiation Of Proceedings U/S 147 Of The It Act Ceased To Survive As The Officer Has Not Made Any Additions On The Issue On Which The Reasons For Reopening Are Based, Hence, A.O Is Not Justified In Making The Addition On Other Issues. We Have Heard Ld. Counsel & Ld. Dr

For Appellant: Shri K.A Sai PrasadFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 50CSection 54Section 68

50C of the IT Act and in the assessment order there is no addition on the so called escapement of income and this aspect was Shri Venu Gopal Karavadi, Hyderabad. accepted by A.O, as Assessee entitled for a deduction u/s 154 of the IT Act. Therefore, since the very reason for reopening of assessment has not resulted in any addition