BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi99Bangalore77Mumbai69Karnataka45Nagpur21Ahmedabad15Kolkata14Lucknow12Jaipur10Agra9Hyderabad9Indore9Surat9Cochin8Pune7Chandigarh7Panaji6Chennai5Jodhpur4Amritsar4Telangana4Ranchi3SC2Kerala1Varanasi1Orissa1Visakhapatnam1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 271B15TDS9Section 408Section 44A6Section 272A(2)(k)6Penalty6Addition to Income5Section 201(1)4Section 2503Section 147

TELANGANA STATE MEDICAL SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS, RANGE-3, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all three appeals under consideration are allowed in above terms

ITA 1530/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 133ASection 200(3)Section 272ASection 272A(2)(k)

TDS)-2, ITA No.1999/Mum/2017 dated 05.10.2018. The provisions of Section 272A(2)(k) are subject to provisions of section 273B

TELANGANA STATE MEDICAL SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS, RANGE-3, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA

3
Section 44B3
Survey u/s 133A3

In the result, all three appeals under consideration are allowed in above terms

ITA 1528/HYD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 133ASection 200(3)Section 272ASection 272A(2)(k)

TDS)-2, ITA No.1999/Mum/2017 dated 05.10.2018. The provisions of Section 272A(2)(k) are subject to provisions of section 273B

TELANGANA STATE MEDICAL SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, TDS, RANGE-3, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all three appeals under consideration are allowed in above terms

ITA 1529/HYD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 133ASection 200(3)Section 272ASection 272A(2)(k)

TDS)-2, ITA No.1999/Mum/2017 dated 05.10.2018. The provisions of Section 272A(2)(k) are subject to provisions of section 273B

KRISHNA HARI GADDAM,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-12(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 668/HYD/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Apr 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं/Ita No.668/Hyd/2023 (नििाारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2020-21) Krishna Hari Gaddam, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad Ward-12(1), [Pan No. Adepg7798Q] Hyderabad अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत् यर्थी/Respondent नििााररती द्वारा/Assessee By: Shri H. Srinivasulu, Ar राजस् व द्वारा/Revenue By: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Dr सुिवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 29/04/2024 घोर्णा की तारीख/Pronouncement On: 30/04/2024 आदेश / Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 02/11/2023 Passed By The Addl/Jcit(A)-5, Chennai, (“Ld. Cit(A)”) Relating To The Assessment Year (Ay) 2020-21. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Was A Salaried Employee Of Karvy Stock Broking Limited. For The Year Under Consideration, The Assessee Fled His Return Of Income, Declaring A Total Income Of Rs. 86,10,680/- & Paid Total Income Tax Of Rs. 27,37,674/-, Consisting Of Tax Deducted At Source (“Tds”) Of Rs. 15,11,384/- & Self Assessment Tax Of Rs.12,26,290/-. The Cpc Bengluru (“Cpc”) In The Intimation U/S 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”), Dt. 08/05/2021 Did Not Give Credit Of Rs. 13,50,000/- Out Of Total Tds Of Rs. 14,75,000/- Deducted By M/S. Karvy Stock Broking Limited U/S. 192 Of The Act, Contending That Form 26As Does Contains The Details Of Tds Of Rs. 13,50,000/- & Finally Raised A Demand Of Rs.14,17,500/-.

For Appellant: Shri H. Srinivasulu, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR
Section 143(1)Section 192

273B and 278AA of the Act, respectively. 9. Importantly, section 201 (2), provides that where a person who, although required to, does not deduct tax or does not pay the tax deducted at source or after deducting fails to pay wholly or part of the tax as required under the Act, would have a statutory charge created on his assets

AR ASSOCIATES,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 817/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. & आ.अपी.सं /Ita No 817 To 819/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2017-18) Ar Associates Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Circle 6 (1) Pan:Aavfa2434K Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Hari Agarwal, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Gudimella V P Pavan Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 13/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 21/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Hari Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Gudimella V P Pavan
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271BSection 44ASection 44B

TDS returned, received commission/brokerage as well as the profession and technical fees. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 of the Act, which was not responded by the assessee. Consequently, the Assessing Officer framed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act, as “best judgment assessment” whereby the income of the assessee was estimated by the Assessing Officer

AR ASSOCIATES,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 818/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. & आ.अपी.सं /Ita No 817 To 819/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2017-18) Ar Associates Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Circle 6 (1) Pan:Aavfa2434K Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Hari Agarwal, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Gudimella V P Pavan Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 13/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 21/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Hari Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Gudimella V P Pavan
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271BSection 44ASection 44B

TDS returned, received commission/brokerage as well as the profession and technical fees. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 of the Act, which was not responded by the assessee. Consequently, the Assessing Officer framed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act, as “best judgment assessment” whereby the income of the assessee was estimated by the Assessing Officer

AR ASSOCIATES,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 819/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G. & आ.अपी.सं /Ita No 817 To 819/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2017-18) Ar Associates Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Circle 6 (1) Pan:Aavfa2434K Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Hari Agarwal, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Gudimella V P Pavan Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 13/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 21/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Hari Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Gudimella V P Pavan
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271BSection 44ASection 44B

TDS returned, received commission/brokerage as well as the profession and technical fees. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 of the Act, which was not responded by the assessee. Consequently, the Assessing Officer framed the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act, as “best judgment assessment” whereby the income of the assessee was estimated by the Assessing Officer

NEERUS ENSEMBLES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 163/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.162 & 163/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2017-18) Neerus Ensembles Pvt. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Ltd., Income Tax, Circle 16(1), Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaccn1554D (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By:: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 05/06/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 12/06/2024 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M These Two Appeals Filed By Neerus Ensembles Pvt. Ltd. (“Assessee”) Feeling Aggrieved By The Separate Orders Both Dated 22/12/2023 Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi (“Ld. Cit(A)”) Relating To A.Y.2017-18. Page 1 Of 10

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 201(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

TDS from the relevant document and allow the deduction in accordance with the law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The grounds of the appeal are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. 12. To sum up, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No.162/Hyd/2024 is allowed for statistical purposes. 13. This appeal is against the order

NEERUS ENSEMBLES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 162/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.162 & 163/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2017-18) Neerus Ensembles Pvt. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Ltd., Income Tax, Circle 16(1), Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaccn1554D (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By:: Ms. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 05/06/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 12/06/2024 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M These Two Appeals Filed By Neerus Ensembles Pvt. Ltd. (“Assessee”) Feeling Aggrieved By The Separate Orders Both Dated 22/12/2023 Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi (“Ld. Cit(A)”) Relating To A.Y.2017-18. Page 1 Of 10

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Ms. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 201(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

TDS from the relevant document and allow the deduction in accordance with the law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The grounds of the appeal are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. 12. To sum up, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No.162/Hyd/2024 is allowed for statistical purposes. 13. This appeal is against the order