V-SECURE FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(4), HYDERABAD
In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1906/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 May 2018AY 2013-14
Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2013-14 V- Secure Financial Services Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. Ward – 17(4), Hyderabad.
For Appellant: Shri T. Rajendra PrasadFor Respondent: Smt. N. Swapna
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 246(1)(a)Section 246A
271H(3) that too by expressly put bar for penalty under Section 272A by insertion of proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section
