BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 244A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai269Delhi157Bangalore86Kolkata51Chennai23Karnataka22Ahmedabad14Pune7Chandigarh7Jaipur6Hyderabad4Cochin4Dehradun4Lucknow4SC3Himachal Pradesh2Cuttack1Ranchi1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 244A7Section 266Section 1546Section 143(1)4Section 1994TDS3Section 139(5)2Addition to Income2

RANCHI EXPRESSWAYS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1594/HYD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), but could not succeed. The Ld. CIT(A) for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 25.01.2019 rejected the explanation of the assessee and sustained additions made by the A.O. towards refund of TDS along with interest by holding that, as per the provisions of Section 199 of the Act read with Rule 37BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, which is applicable w.e.f. A.Y. 2018-19, unless corresponding income is offered to tax, TDS related to the said income cannot be allowed

Section 143(1)Section 199Section 244A

244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was already issued to the assessee in the order passed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.12.2016. 3. Aggrieved with the order of A.O., assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), but could not succeed. The Ld. CIT(A) for the reasons stated in their

TIRUMALA ESTATES,HYDERABAD vs. ITO,WARD-4(5), HYDERABAD

In the result, both appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 215/HYD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Mohd Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, Sr.AR
Section 143(1)Section 244ASection 26

1) and issued intimation in communication reference No.CPC/1718/A5/1886054632 dt: 28.03.2019, determining the refund at Rs.48,107/-, including interest u/s 244A of the IT Act, as against the total claim of Rs.14,24,740/-. TDS was given credit only to an extent of Rs.45, 175/- in the said intimation. The TDS as per 26AS and also claimed by the assessee

TIRUMALA ESTATES,HYDERABAD vs. ITO,WARD-4(5), HYDERABAD

In the result, both appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 216/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Mohd Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, Sr.AR
Section 143(1)Section 244ASection 26

1) and issued intimation in communication reference No.CPC/1718/A5/1886054632 dt: 28.03.2019, determining the refund at Rs.48,107/-, including interest u/s 244A of the IT Act, as against the total claim of Rs.14,24,740/-. TDS was given credit only to an extent of Rs.45, 175/- in the said intimation. The TDS as per 26AS and also claimed by the assessee

NEERAJ KUMAR AGARWAL ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 704/HYD/2020[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2022AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Sri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Sri K.P.R.R. Murthy
Section 139(5)Section 154

section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (e) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have followed the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of ITO v. Volkart Brothers and Others, 82 ITR 50 (S.C.) with regard to mistake apparent from record that qualities for an action