KARTHIKEYA HOTELS,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: the Tribunal. Shri D. Veera Reddy, being the partner of the assessee and who looks after the affairs of the assessee, has filed an affidavit explaining the reasons that, the appeal relates to proceedings under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and that the order of Ld. CIT(A) dated 27.02.2025 was received by email on 27.02.2025. The partner of the assessee was not well and was having medical issues which required frequent visits to the hospitals and upon performing various procedures

TDS, Ward-1(4), PAN : HYDK07659B Hyderabad. (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ : Shri M.V. Anil Kumar & Assessee Sreelekha, Advocates. Represented by राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ : Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik – Department Represented by CIT-DR सुिवाई समाप्त होिे की ततति/ : 09.12.2025 Date of Conclusion of Hearing घोर्णध की तधरीख/ : 12.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement O R D E R PER MANJUNATHA

VIVIMED LABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), HYDERABAD