OPTUM GLOBAL SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

37(1) of the Act. The company can claim deduction for hundred percent of the donation of Rs. 1 crores paid to Prime Minister's National Relief Fund u/s 80G(2)(iiia) read with Section 80G(1)(i) of the Act. The company claim deduction to the extent of fifty percent of the donation of Rs. 1 crores paid

OPTUM GLOBAL SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE -5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

37(1) of the Act. The company can claim deduction for hundred percent of the donation of Rs. 1 crores paid to Prime Minister's National Relief Fund u/s 80G(2)(iiia) read with Section 80G(1)(i) of the Act. The company claim deduction to the extent of fifty percent of the donation of Rs. 1 crores paid

SANGHI TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERBAD vs. ITO., WARD-3(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Us:

37(1) of the Act. 13. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have considered the fact that return of income filed u/s 148 of the Act shall be considered as valid and ought to have appreciated the fact any claim made in return filed u/s 148 of the Act which is not claimed in return of income

COUNTRY CLUB HOSPITALITY & HOLIDAYS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

37(1) of the Act. The Hon’ble Supreme Court had also taken note of the fact that in the previous years, whenever the dollar rates would be reduced, the department had taxed the gains which accrued to the assessee therein on the basis of accrual and it was only in the relevant year when the dollar rates increased resulting

DY.CIT, CIR-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. M/S CUNTRY CLUB (I) LIMITED,, HYDERABAD

In the result, the grounds of the appeal of the assessee on this issue are allowed

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S Country Club Vs. Asst. Cit, Circle-1(2), Hospitality & Holidays Ltd., Hyderabad. (Formerly Known As Country Club India Ltd.,) Hyderabad.

2. That the learned m (A) erred in upholding the addition of Rs. 1,42,84,760/disallowed under the Provisions of S. 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961 which is not correct and not justified. 3. That the expenditure of Rs. 1,42,84,760/- has been incurred in cash for purchase of items such as vegetables, fruits, dairy

M/S. COUNTRY CLUB INDIA LTD.,,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the grounds of the appeal of the assessee on this issue are allowed

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S Country Club Vs. Asst. Cit, Circle-1(2), Hospitality & Holidays Ltd., Hyderabad. (Formerly Known As Country Club India Ltd.,) Hyderabad.

2. That the learned m (A) erred in upholding the addition of Rs. 1,42,84,760/disallowed under the Provisions of S. 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961 which is not correct and not justified. 3. That the expenditure of Rs. 1,42,84,760/- has been incurred in cash for purchase of items such as vegetables, fruits, dairy

ANALOGICS TECH INDIA LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

TDS and contended that the same may be allowed as an expenditure u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. In his written statement, ld. AR for the assessee contended that the interest u/s 201(1A) cannot be compared with the interest paid u/s 220(2) of the Act. In fact, as per section

BHUPAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

TDS under Section 194C of the Act. Therefore, we direct the A.O. to delete the additions made towards disallowance of subcontract payments to Bathini Infra and Shankarapally under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for Rs.5,47,454/- and Rs.4,13,765/-, respectively. 37. Insofar as the disallowance of sum of Rs. 2

BHUPAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

TDS under Section 194C of the Act. Therefore, we direct the A.O. to delete the additions made towards disallowance of subcontract payments to Bathini Infra and Shankarapally under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for Rs.5,47,454/- and Rs.4,13,765/-, respectively. 37. Insofar as the disallowance of sum of Rs. 2

BHUPAL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

TDS under Section 194C of the Act. Therefore, we direct the A.O. to delete the additions made towards disallowance of subcontract payments to Bathini Infra and Shankarapally under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act for Rs.5,47,454/- and Rs.4,13,765/-, respectively. 37. Insofar as the disallowance of sum of Rs. 2

BHARAT FINANCIAL INCLUSION LIMITED (ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS SKS MICROFINCANCE LIMITED), HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT (TDS), CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2012-13 Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd. Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Vs. (Erstwhile Known As Sks Tax (Tds), Circle – 2(1), Microfinance Ltd.), Hyderabad Hyderabad. Pan – Aaics 2940J (Appellant) (Respondent)

37,948 Company to Mr. Vikram u/s 192 o the Act paid on 7 June, 2012. Interest u/s 201(1A) on above 63,90,623 TDS on non-compete fee 65,00,000 Company payable to Mr. Vikram u/s 194J paid on 7 of the Act June 12 Interest u/s 201(1A) on above 7,80,000 Total

PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita.No.625/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2021-2022 Progressive Constructions The Dcit, Limited, Hyderabad. Circle-5(1) Vs. Pin – 500 001. Telangana. Hyderabad - 500 004. Pan Aabcp2274M Telangana. (Appellant) (Respondent) Ca Pawan Kumar Chakrapani िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By : & Sri Santi Pavan Kumar, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By : Sri Lv Bhaskara Reddy, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 02.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 04.03.2026 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Rao:

2. Nature of business undertaken by you during the year under consideration. 3. With respect to the purchases made by you, kindly provide details as under: xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 36 ITA.No.625/Hyd./2025 8. With respect to contract receipts or fees u/s 194C shown in ITR, kindly provide the following details: i) Name of the party

SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED,KOTHAGUDEM vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-13(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं / Ita Nos.283, 284 & 286/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2020-21) Singareni Collieries Vs. Acit, Circle – 1 Company Limited Khammam & Kothagudem Acit, Circle 13(1) Pan:Aaact8873F Hyderabad & आ.अपी.सं / Ita Nos.300, 301 & 308/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2020-21) Vs. Dy. Cit, Circle 13(1) Hyderabad Singareni Collieries Company Limited Kothagudem Pan:Aaact8873F (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धारिती द्वारा / Assessee By: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, Advocate राजस्व द्वारा / Revenue By:: Shri B Balakrishna, Cit (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 10/06/2025 घोषणा की तारीख / Pronouncement: 12/06/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These 3 Sets Of Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As The Revenue Are Directed Against The 3 Separate Orders All Dated 30/01/2024 Of The Learned Cit (A)-Nfac Delhi, For The A.Ys 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2020-21 Respectively. The Assessee As Well As The Revenue Have Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeals For 3 A.Ys:

37,79,77,452/- under Section 40A(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. Your Appellant submits that the CIT(A) as well as the Assessing Officer disallowed investment allowance under Section 32AC of Rs.240,00,69,986/- on assumption that electricity is not an article or thing and also ignored the bills and certificates in support of acquisition

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

TDS u/s. 194H in respect of commission payments made to distribution on prepaid connections. 4. When the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) passed a combined order for all the AYs under consideration and confirmed the orders of AO. :- 3 -: ITA Nos. 1913 to 1919/Hyd/2019 Vodafone Idea Ltd., Hyd. 5. Aggrieved by the order

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

TDS u/s. 194H in respect of commission payments made to distribution on prepaid connections. 4. When the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) passed a combined order for all the AYs under consideration and confirmed the orders of AO. :- 3 -: ITA Nos. 1913 to 1919/Hyd/2019 Vodafone Idea Ltd., Hyd. 5. Aggrieved by the order

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

TDS u/s. 194H in respect of commission payments made to distribution on prepaid connections. 4. When the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) passed a combined order for all the AYs under consideration and confirmed the orders of AO. :- 3 -: ITA Nos. 1913 to 1919/Hyd/2019 Vodafone Idea Ltd., Hyd. 5. Aggrieved by the order

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

TDS u/s. 194H in respect of commission payments made to distribution on prepaid connections. 4. When the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) passed a combined order for all the AYs under consideration and confirmed the orders of AO. :- 3 -: ITA Nos. 1913 to 1919/Hyd/2019 Vodafone Idea Ltd., Hyd. 5. Aggrieved by the order

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

TDS u/s. 194H in respect of commission payments made to distribution on prepaid connections. 4. When the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) passed a combined order for all the AYs under consideration and confirmed the orders of AO. :- 3 -: ITA Nos. 1913 to 1919/Hyd/2019 Vodafone Idea Ltd., Hyd. 5. Aggrieved by the order

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

TDS u/s. 194H in respect of commission payments made to distribution on prepaid connections. 4. When the assessee preferred appeals before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) passed a combined order for all the AYs under consideration and confirmed the orders of AO. :- 3 -: ITA Nos. 1913 to 1919/Hyd/2019 Vodafone Idea Ltd., Hyd. 5. Aggrieved by the order