BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 197Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai93Nagpur92Delhi59Karnataka26Bangalore25Kolkata22Mumbai15Cochin10Jaipur6Panaji6Hyderabad5Pune2Visakhapatnam1Chandigarh1Jodhpur1Lucknow1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 206A12Deduction5TDS5Section 90(2)4Section 201(1)4Section 2014Section 404Section 197A4Disallowance4Survey u/s 133A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(IT)-II, HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, SECUNDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 725/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.725/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16) Dy. C.I.T (It)-Ii Vs. Sew Infrastructure Ltd Hyderabad Secunderabad Pan:Aadcs4061P (Appellant) (Respondent) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Shri B Bala Krishna, Cit(Dr) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri S. Rama Rao, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 22/10/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 28/10/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B Bala Krishna, CIT(DR)
Section 154Section 2Section 206ASection 90Section 90(2)Section 9O(2)

TDS applicable. xi. CBDT Circular No.5 of 2010 setting out explanatory notes to Finance (No.2) Bill, 2009 clearly explains the scope of section 206AA extending it to non-residents. xii. The non-residents as non-residents are not required to obtain PAN as per section 139A(8) r.w. rule 114C of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, however section 206AA

4

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 8/HYD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

TDS has failed and hence, the AO is right in invoking the provisions of Sec.201 (1)and Sec.201(1A) of the Act.” 7. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. 8. Before us, the ld. AR of the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the CIT(A) and submitted that

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 10/HYD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

TDS has failed and hence, the AO is right in invoking the provisions of Sec.201 (1)and Sec.201(1A) of the Act.” 7. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. 8. Before us, the ld. AR of the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the CIT(A) and submitted that

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 11/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

TDS has failed and hence, the AO is right in invoking the provisions of Sec.201 (1)and Sec.201(1A) of the Act.” 7. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. 8. Before us, the ld. AR of the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the CIT(A) and submitted that

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 9/HYD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

TDS has failed and hence, the AO is right in invoking the provisions of Sec.201 (1)and Sec.201(1A) of the Act.” 7. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT. 8. Before us, the ld. AR of the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the CIT(A) and submitted that