BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

98 results for “TDS”+ Section 145(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai572Delhi464Kolkata226Bangalore212Chennai149Karnataka114Chandigarh111Hyderabad98Jaipur94Ahmedabad92Cochin73Pune53Raipur40Lucknow40Ranchi33Visakhapatnam31Surat29Indore27Agra22Rajkot17Amritsar17Jodhpur14Nagpur11Patna8Guwahati8Allahabad8Varanasi6Dehradun5Panaji3SC2Jabalpur2Calcutta2J&K1

Key Topics

Addition to Income47Section 80I46Section 143(3)45Disallowance38TDS35Section 143(1)30Section 14826Deduction24Section 80G22Section 143(2)

SKANDHANSHI DEVELOPERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 526/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

TDS, which attracts disallowance u/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, considering the overall scenario including relevant books of accounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating material found during the course of search observed that, the profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during the course of search proceedings should be more than the profit percentage

SKANDHANSHI DEVELOPERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 528/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

section 145(3) of the I.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore rejected.\n\nThe relevant findings of the Assessing Officer are as follows :\n\nThe assessee is not in a position to substantiate its claim of expenses by producing supporting vouchers and other documentary evidences to establish the admissibility of expenses associated with the undisclosed

Showing 1–20 of 98 · Page 1 of 5

17
Section 139(1)13
Section 142(1)12

COUNTRY CLUB HOSPITALITY & HOLIDAYS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1480/HYD/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Mar 2026AY 2011-12
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 250

145(1) is attracted to the facts of the present case. Under the mercantile system of accounting, what is due is brought into credit before it is actually received; it brings into debit an expenditure for which a legal liability has been incurred before it is actually disbursed. (see judgment of this Court in the case of United Commercial Bank

SKANDA INFRA PROJECTS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 523/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

section 145(3) of\nthe I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore\nrejected.\n8.1. Having rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be\nestimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n8.2. The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment\nproceedings accepted that

SKANDA BUILDERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 531/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

section 145(3) of the Act. \n7. In response to the showcause notice dated 20.06.2023, the assessee has \nfurnished a reply on 23.06.2023 through mail, which is reproduced as under : \n“Gist of the case \n1. In response to the Show Cause Notice dt. 12.05.2023, a detailed reply \ndt. 20.05.2023 explaining the relevant facts and circumstances of the case \nwas

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 521/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: \nMr. C. Srin

section 145(3) of\nthe I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore\nrejected.\n\n8. 1. Having rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be\nestimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n8. 2. The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment

SKANDA INFRA PROJECTS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 524/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

section 145(3) of\nthe I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore\nrejected.\nHaving rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be\nestimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n8.2 The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment\nproceedings accepted that

SKANDA BUILDERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 532/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

section 145(3) of\nthe I.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore\nrejected.\nHaving rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be\nestimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n8. 1. The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment\nproceedings accepted that

SKANDA INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 516/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

145(3) are reproduced hereunder:\n“Where the Assessing Officer is not satisfied about the correctness or\ncompleteness of the accounts of the assessee, or where the method\naccounting provided in section-section (1) [ has not been regularly followed by\nthe assessee, or income has not been computed in accordance with the\nstandards notified under section (2) ] the Assessing Officer

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 519/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

145(3) are reproduced hereunder:\n“Where the Assessing Officer is not satisfied about the correctness or\ncompleteness of the accounts of the assessee, or where the method\naccounting provided in section-section (1) [ has not been regularly followed by\nthe assessee, or income has not been computed in accordance with the\nstandards notified under section (2) ] the Assessing Officer

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

ITA 311/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

section 145(3) of the I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore rejected.\n\nHaving rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be estimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n\n8.2 The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment proceedings accepted

MADHUCON PROJECTS LTD, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1326/HYD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

145 of the Act. 12. The assessee has relied upon case-law of the Hyderabad Tribunal in the case of BHAGYANAGAR CONSTRUCTION (P) 124) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER vide 1993 (046) ITD-0236-THYD dated 12.04.1993 where in it was held that “in case of a building contractor, the revenue need not wait till the completion of the tract

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1938/HYD/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

145 of the Act. 12. The assessee has relied upon case-law of the Hyderabad Tribunal in the case of BHAGYANAGAR CONSTRUCTION (P) 124) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER vide 1993 (046) ITD-0236-THYD dated 12.04.1993 where in it was held that “in case of a building contractor, the revenue need not wait till the completion of the tract

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1937/HYD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

145 of the Act. 12. The assessee has relied upon case-law of the Hyderabad Tribunal in the case of BHAGYANAGAR CONSTRUCTION (P) 124) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER vide 1993 (046) ITD-0236-THYD dated 12.04.1993 where in it was held that “in case of a building contractor, the revenue need not wait till the completion of the tract

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 535/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

section 145(3) of\nthe I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore\nrejected.\n\nHaving rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be\nestimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n\n8. 1. The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment\nproceedings

SURESH KUMAR REDDY KRISHNAPURAM,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 539/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

section 145(3) of the I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore rejected.\n\nHaving rejecting the books, the income of the assessee is required to be estimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n\n8. 2. The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment proceedings

SKANDA INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 515/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

145(3) of the Income-tax Act to reject the books of accounts.\nThe rejection of the appellant's books of accounts is therefore\nupheld, and Ground of Appeal No. 7 is accordingly dismissed.\n6.7 In Ground no. 8, the appellant has contended that the Assessing Officer\nselectively relied on the seized material by recognizing entries related to\nreceipts while

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 518/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

section 145(3) of\nthe I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore\nrejected.\n\nHaving rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be\nestimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n\n8. 2. The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well as assessment\nproceedings

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

ITA 309/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

145(3) are reproduced hereunder :\n“Where the Assessing Officer is not satisfied about the correctness or\ncompleteness of the accounts of the assessee, or where the method\naccounting provided in section-section (1) [ has not been regularly followed by\nthe assessee or income has not been computed in accordance with the\nstatutes notified under section (2)] the Assessing Officer

SKANDA BUILDERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 530/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

section 145(3) of\nthe I.T.Act. The books of accounts maintained by the assessee are therefore\nrejected.\n\n8. 1. Having rejected the books, the income of the assessee is required to be\nestimated based on the material available on record as per the following findings.\n\n8. 2. The assessee during the course of search proceedings as well