BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi121Mumbai94Bangalore84Ahmedabad29Lucknow28Kolkata28Pune28Jaipur18Chennai16Visakhapatnam13Indore13Rajkot6Chandigarh6Hyderabad6Amritsar5Jodhpur3Karnataka3Telangana3Dehradun2Surat2Panaji1Guwahati1Punjab & Haryana1Raipur1Rajasthan1Cochin1Jabalpur1Agra1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 1110Section 234E7Section 201(1)6TDS6Section 2015Section 12A4Section 1544Section 80I4Section 11(5)4Deduction

VIVIMED LABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 1237/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2022-23
For Appellant: \nShri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: \nShri K. Vinoth Kannan
Section 154Section 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250Section 311

12A of the Commercial Courts\nAct, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments\nAct, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for\ninstituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can\ncondone delay) and termination of proceedings. In our view, the prescribed time\nlimit for filing TDS

4
Exemption3
Disallowance3

VIVIMED LABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee company, being devoid and bereft of any substance, is dismissed

ITA 1236/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1236 & 1237/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2021-22 & 2022-23) Vivimed Labs Limited, Vs. Dcit, Hyderabad. Central Circle-3(4), Pan: Aaacv6060A Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca राज" व "वारा/Revenue By: Shri K. Vinoth Kannan, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of 05/01/2026 Hearing: घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 21/01/2026 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri K. Vinoth Kannan
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250Section 311

12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings. In our view, the prescribed time limit for filing TDS

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 445/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri C.S.Subramanyam, ARFor Respondent: Shri T.Sunil Goutam, DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 80G

TDS compared to the claim in the return of income. The Appellant craves leave to, add to, amend to or modify the above grounds of appeal either before or during the hearings of the appeal, as permitted by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal). STATEMENT OF FACTS The assessee is a charitable entity registered under Section 12A

SHILPARAMAM ARTS, CRAFTS AND CULTURAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, EXEMPTION CIRCLE 1(1) , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 547/HYD/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Feb 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Y.V. Bhanu Narayan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri N. Raja Kumar, DR
Section 12ASection 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) and working under Youth Advancement Tourism and Culture Department (YAT & C), Government of Telangana State. Assessee society was established with the objects of promotion of Art & Culture and providing support to artists and artisans by the United State of Andhra Pradesh. The receipts of the society are related

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -3 (1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 104/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, ARFor Respondent: Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 92CSection 92E

TDS to the tune of Rs. 30,211/- without assigning any reasons therefor. 10. The appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any of the grounds during the course of hearing.” 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee-company is engaged in manufacturing of Clinker and Ordinary Portland Cement. The assessee, being the third largest cement

SWARNA EDUCATIONAL ACADEMY,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 713/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad14 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Darshan JakhariaFor Respondent: Shri KPRR Murthy
Section 10Section 11Section 11(1)Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 13ASection 13BSection 143(1)Section 250

TDS and had filed return in Form Type 7 and has not claimed any deduction exemptions under section 11 or clauses of Section 10 or Section 13A or Section 13B in schedule Part B-TI of the return. In response to the same, the assessee filed return of income on 21.5.2019 correcting the defect declaring the income at Rs.1