EXPRESSWAY SERVICES PVT LTD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

127 of the Act. Thus, in the case of the assessee, the Assessing Officer of the searched party and appellant was the same jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Further, the present assessments for all the three assessment years are framed under Section 153C of the Act, in pursuant to search action conducted in the case of M/s. Prathima Infrastructure Limited

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. Y S JAGAN MOHAN REDDY, KADAPA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee is\nallowed

TDS \"\n2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)\nNFAC, Delhi is justified in allowing the appeal of the\nAssessee on merits.\n21. The assessee had also filed a petition for admission of\nadditional grounds of cross objection on 05.04.2024 and\nrelevant additional grounds of cross objection filed by the\nassessee are reproduced as under :\nThe Ld.Addl.CIT erred in assuming

ANALOGICS TECH INDIA LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

TDS), and other similar payments are allowable expenditures under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act and are compensatory in nature and he has drawn our attention to section 50 of the GST Act which provides as under : “Section 50- Interest on delayed payment of tax.- (1) Every person who is liable to pay tax in accordance with

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

127 Taxmann.com\n290. Therefore, if law require something to be done in a particular\nmanner, then it must be done in that manner; if it is not done in\nthat manner then it would have no existence in the eyes law. By\nPage 6 of 78\n\nfollowing the said principles, the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court\nin the case

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

127 Taxmann.com\n290. Therefore, if law require something to be done in a particular\nmanner, then it must be done in that manner; if it is not done in\nthat manner then it would have no existence in the eyes law. By\n\nfollowing the said principles, the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court\nin the case of Kankanala Ravindra Reddy

CONCENTRIX CATALYST TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE - 1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in\nterms of our aforesaid observations

127 in relation to payment of interest on ECB by the\nAppellant to AΕ.\n11. erred in not appreciating the fact that the interest rate of 4.50% p.a. payable by the Appellant is less\nthan the all in cost interest ceiling of 6 months USD LIBOR + 450 basis points for foreign currency\ndenominated ECB as prescribed in the RBI Circular

SIVA SANKARA REDDY TUNGA,HYDERABAD. vs. ITO., WARD - 14(1), HYDERABAD.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

TDS Statement): Rs.1,25,775/-; and (iv) time deposit exceeding Rs.2 lakhs or more with Andhra Bank: Rs.26,00,000/- , but had not filed his return of income for the subject year, i.e., AY 2016- 17, issued notice under section 148A(b) of the Act. Thereafter, the AO passed an order under section 148A(d) of the Act, dated 25/03/2023

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. COASTAL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, the C.O. filed by the assessee is allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the I.T. Act. 6. The belief entertained is not the A.O’s own belief but borrowed belief of the Investigation Wing Kolkata. The proceedings of reopening are invalid in law. :- 3 -: ITA No.. 497/Hyd/2019 and CO 16/H/2019 Coastal Projects Pvt. Ltd., Hyd. 7. The grounds of appeal raised by the A.O do not arise either from

NEO SEEDS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-16(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Us:

section 282 of the Act r.w. rule 127 of the Rules, and therefore Appellant could not put forth his case. 2. Without prejudice to the above, the Id. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition made by the AO of Rs.32,58,747 by disallowing the claim of revenue expenditure spend on research and development, which amount was not approved

SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE2-(2), HYDERABAD vs. SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE2-(2), HYDERABAD vs. SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE2-(2), HYDERABAD vs. SUSHEE INFRA & MINING LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण वर्ा अपीलधर्थी प्रत्‍यर्थी / Ita No. / A.Y. / Appellant / Respondent

2 of assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. 59. Ground No.3 raised by the assessee and Grounds No. 3 & 4 of Revenue relate to the order of the learned CIT(A) in granting part relief to the assessee by confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.89,69,768/- Page 31 of 37 M/s. Sushee Infra & Mining