EXEL RUBBER PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for the\nA

seizure action\nconducted in the case of Shri Ramesh Kumar\nSanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as\nunder:\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\nM/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka\n(B) Warrant to search\nFlat No. 401, Chestiya Estates,\nNear Nagarjuna High School, Rajeev Nagar,\nKhairatabad, Hyderabad

EXEL RUBBER PRIVATE LIMITED,K.V.RANGAREDDY vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for the\nA

seizure action\nconducted in the case of Shri Ramesh Kumar\nSanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as\nunder:\n\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n(B) Warrant to search\nM/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka\nFlat No. 401, Chestiya Estates,\nNear Nagarjuna High School, Rajeev Nagar,\nKhairatabad, Hyderabad

EXEL RUBBER PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for the\nA

seizure action\nconducted in the case of Shri Ramesh Kumar\nSanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as\nunder:\n\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n(B) Warrant to search\nM/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka\nFlat No. 401, Chestiya Estates,\nNear Nagarjuna High School, Rajeev Nagar,\nKhairatabad, Hyderabad

SKANDA BUILDERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(3), HYDERABAD

TDS, which attracts disallowance \nu/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, \nconsidering the overall scenario including relevant books of \naccounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating \nmaterial found during the course of search observed that, \nthe profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during \nthe course of search proceedings should be more than the \nprofit percentage

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

search & seizure action in\ncase of Exel Group of companies comprising M/s. Exel Rubber (P)\nLtd, M/s. Ace Tyres (P) Ltd, M/s. Vilas Polymers (P) Ltd, M/s.\nSpinmax Tyres (P) Ltd and M/s. Laxes Machine (P) Ltd vide\nwarrant of authorisation and Panchanama as under:\n\nPANCHANAMA\n\nParty No. MARS-1\n\nSI\nName of Officer/ Official\nDesignation\nOffice

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\n\nPage 22 of 78\n\nPANCHANAMA\n\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n(B) Warrant to search\n(Details & Ownership of\nplace of search)\nTelephone Numbers

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

TDS, which attracts disallowance\nu/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore,\nconsidering the overall scenario including relevant books of\naccounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating\nmaterial found during the course of search observed that,\nthe profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during\nthe course of search proceedings should be more than the\nprofit percentage

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\nPage 22 of 78\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n(B) Warrant to search\n(Details & Ownership of\nplace of search)\nTelephone Numbers

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\n\nPage 22 of 78\n\nPANCHANAMA\n\nParty No. HO\n\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n\n:\nM/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka\n\n(B) Warrant to search\n\n:\nFlat

VILAS POLYMER PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD., HYDERABAD

search & seizure action in case of Exel Group of\ncompanies comprising M/s. Exel Rubber (P) Ltd, M/s. Ace\nTyres (P) Ltd, M/s. Vilas Polymers (P) Ltd, M/s. Spinmax\nTyres (P) Ltd and M/s. Laxes Machine (P) Ltd vide warrant\nof authorisation and Panchanama as under:\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. MARS-1\nName of Officer/ Official\nNo\n01\nShaik Shakeer Ahmed\nJOFT

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\n\nPANCHANAMA\n\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n\n(B) Warrant to search\n\n(Details & Ownership of\nplace of search)\n\n(C) (A) and (B) stated

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\n\nPage 22 of 78\n\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\nM/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka\n(B) Warrant to search\nFlat No. 401, Chestiya Estates,\nNear Nagarjuna High

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

TDS, which attracts disallowance\nu/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore,\nconsidering the overall scenario including relevant books of\n12\nITA.Nos.514 to 539/Hyd./2025,\nAnd ITA.Nos.308 to 311/Hyd./2025.\naccounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating\nmaterial found during the course of search observed that,\nthe profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during\nthe course

ACE CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

search and seizure operation was conducted in the case of Ajaz Farooqi, who is one of the partners of assessee firm and his related business concerns and other key persons on 04.07.2017 and seized some incriminating material. On verification of seized material, it was found that it pertains to assessee firm. Accordingly, notice u/s 153C of the Act was issued

ACE CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

search and seizure operation was conducted in the case of Ajaz Farooqi, who is one of the partners of assessee firm and his related business concerns and other key persons on 04.07.2017 and seized some incriminating material. On verification of seized material, it was found that it pertains to assessee firm. Accordingly, notice u/s 153C of the Act was issued

ROYAL ENGINEERING,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

search and seizure operation was conducted in the case of Ajaz Farooqi, who is one of the partners of assessee firm and his related business concerns and other key persons on 04.07.2017 and seized some incriminating material. On verification of seized material, it was found that it pertains to assessee firm. Accordingly, notice u/s 153C of the Act was issued

ROYAL ENGINEERING,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

search and seizure operation was conducted in the case of Ajaz Farooqi, who is one of the partners of assessee firm and his related business concerns and other key persons on 04.07.2017 and seized some incriminating material. On verification of seized material, it was found that it pertains to assessee firm. Accordingly, notice u/s 153C of the Act was issued

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE -3(4), HYDERABAD vs. ROYAL ENGINEERING, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

search and seizure operation was conducted in the case of Ajaz Farooqi, who is one of the partners of assessee firm and his related business concerns and other key persons on 04.07.2017 and seized some incriminating material. On verification of seized material, it was found that it pertains to assessee firm. Accordingly, notice u/s 153C of the Act was issued