EXEL RUBBER PRIVATE LIMITED,K.V.RANGAREDDY vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G.

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh Kumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of authorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under: PANCHANAMA Party No. HO (A) Warrant in the case of (B) Warrant to search M/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka Flat No. 401, Chestiya Estates, Near Nagarjuna High School, Rajeev Nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500045. (Details & Ownership

SKANDA BUILDERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(3), HYDERABAD

TDS, which attracts disallowance \nu/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, \nconsidering the overall scenario including relevant books of \naccounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating \nmaterial found during the course of search observed that, \nthe profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during \nthe course of search proceedings should be more than the \nprofit percentage

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

TDS, which attracts disallowance\nu/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore,\nconsidering the overall scenario including relevant books of\naccounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating\nmaterial found during the course of search observed that,\nthe profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during\nthe course of search proceedings should be more than the\nprofit percentage

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\n\nPage 22 of 78\n\nPANCHANAMA\n\nParty No. HO\n\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n\n:\nM/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka\n\n(B) Warrant to search\n\n:\nFlat

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\nPage 22 of 78\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n(B) Warrant to search\n(Details & Ownership of\nplace of search)\nTelephone Numbers

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\n\nPANCHANAMA\n\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\n\n(B) Warrant to search\n\n(Details & Ownership of\nplace of search)\n\n(C) (A) and (B) stated

ACE TYRES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

seizure action conducted in the case of Shri Ramesh\nKumar Sanaka at his Flat bearing No.401 vide warrant of\nauthorization dated 03/01/2023 and Panchama as under:\n\nPage 22 of 78\n\nPANCHANAMA\nParty No. HO\n(A) Warrant in the case of\nM/s Ramesh Kumar Sanaka\n(B) Warrant to search\nFlat No. 401, Chestiya Estates,\nNear Nagarjuna High

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

TDS, which attracts disallowance\nu/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore,\nconsidering the overall scenario including relevant books of\n12\nITA.Nos.514 to 539/Hyd./2025,\nAnd ITA.Nos.308 to 311/Hyd./2025.\naccounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating\nmaterial found during the course of search observed that,\nthe profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during\nthe course

ASR ENGINERING & PROJECTS LIMITED (FORMERLY SAI SUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED), ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

DY. COMMSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3)., HYDERABAD vs. SAI SUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED., HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD vs. ASR ENGINEERING AND PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD vs. ASR ENGINEERING AND PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD vs. ASR ENGINEERING AND PROJECTS LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3)., HYDERABAD vs. SAI SUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

ASR ENGINERING & PROJECTS LIMITED (FORMERLY SAI SUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED), ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

ASR ENGINERING & PROJECTS LIMITED (FORMERLY SAI SUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED), ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

ASR ENGINERING & PROJECTS LIMITED (FORMERLY SAI SUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED), ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure

ASR ENGINERING & PROJECTS LIMITED (FORMERLY SAI SUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED), ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, a) ITA Nos

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmansrl Appeal Number Pan A.Y. Appellant Respondent 1

TDS particulars, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee deducted tax at source contemporaneously and not after the search and seizure