Search: TDS | BharatTax

TDS Rs. 26165215 Less : Advance Tax Rs. 12000000 Balance Tax Rs. 32835948 Add: Interest u/s 234A Rs. 1970157 Add: Interest u/s 234B Rs. 10835863 Add: Interest u/s 234C Rs. 0 Total tax + Int payable Rs. 45641967 Less: Self tax paid Rs. Less: Regular by Rs. 29414128 adjustment of refund Balance Payable. Rs. 16227839 Madhucon Projects Limited, Hyderabad. 25. The assessee

MADHUCON PROJECTS LTD, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1326/HYD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya

Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

TDS Rs. 26165215 Less : Advance Tax Rs. 12000000 Balance Tax Rs. 32835948 Add: Interest u/s 234A Rs. 1970157 Add: Interest u/s 234B Rs. 10835863 Add: Interest u/s 234C Rs. 0 Total tax + Int payable Rs. 45641967 Less: Self tax paid Rs. Less: Regular by Rs. 29414128 adjustment of refund Balance Payable. Rs. 16227839 Madhucon Projects Limited, Hyderabad. 25. The assessee

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1937/HYD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya

Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

TDS Rs. 26165215 Less : Advance Tax Rs. 12000000 Balance Tax Rs. 32835948 Add: Interest u/s 234A Rs. 1970157 Add: Interest u/s 234B Rs. 10835863 Add: Interest u/s 234C Rs. 0 Total tax + Int payable Rs. 45641967 Less: Self tax paid Rs. Less: Regular by Rs. 29414128 adjustment of refund Balance Payable. Rs. 16227839 Madhucon Projects Limited, Hyderabad. 25. The assessee

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, NTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 86/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 113/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 87/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 112/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 307/HYD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR

Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 308/HYD/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR

Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 310/HYD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR

Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS),WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 309/HYD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR

Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 304/HYD/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR

Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 306/HYD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR

Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour