BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

69 results for “TDS”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468Delhi420Mumbai324Pune251Bangalore217Chennai161Indore144Kolkata123Ahmedabad72Chandigarh71Hyderabad69Cochin62Jaipur42Visakhapatnam39Nagpur30Jabalpur27Raipur26Karnataka24Jodhpur24Lucknow24Surat19Agra17Rajkot16Amritsar9Allahabad9Dehradun8Guwahati8Cuttack6Panaji4Ranchi1SC1Telangana1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 154189TDS55Section 143(1)51Section 200A49Rectification u/s 15449Section 234E40Section 201(1)37Section 143(3)28Addition to Income27Section 244A

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 715/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter2 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

rectification u/s 154 being requested. Copy of application u/s 154 dated 19.03.2018 before ITO TDS-2(2), Hyderabad was also

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

Showing 1–20 of 69 · Page 1 of 4

24
Section 271C21
Condonation of Delay20

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 719/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 2-2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

rectification u/s 154 being requested. Copy of application u/s 154 dated 19.03.2018 before ITO TDS-2(2), Hyderabad was also

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 718/HYD/2022[24Q Quarter 4 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

rectification u/s 154 being requested. Copy of application u/s 154 dated 19.03.2018 before ITO TDS-2(2), Hyderabad was also

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 721/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 1 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

rectification u/s 154 being requested. Copy of application u/s 154 dated 19.03.2018 before ITO TDS-2(2), Hyderabad was also

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 720/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 4 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

rectification u/s 154 being requested. Copy of application u/s 154 dated 19.03.2018 before ITO TDS-2(2), Hyderabad was also

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 716/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 3 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

rectification u/s 154 being requested. Copy of application u/s 154 dated 19.03.2018 before ITO TDS-2(2), Hyderabad was also

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 717/HYD/2022[26Q QUARTER-4 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

rectification u/s 154 being requested. Copy of application u/s 154 dated 19.03.2018 before ITO TDS-2(2), Hyderabad was also

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1938/HYD/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

TDS Rs. 26165215 Less : Advance Tax Rs. 12000000 Balance Tax Rs. 32835948 Add: Interest u/s 234A Rs. 1970157 Add: Interest u/s 234B Rs. 10835863 Add: Interest u/s 234C Rs. 0 Total tax + Int payable Rs. 45641967 Less: Self tax paid Rs. Less: Regular by Rs. 29414128 adjustment of refund Balance Payable. Rs. 16227839 Madhucon Projects Limited, Hyderabad. 25. The assessee

MADHUCON PROJECTS LTD, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1326/HYD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

TDS Rs. 26165215 Less : Advance Tax Rs. 12000000 Balance Tax Rs. 32835948 Add: Interest u/s 234A Rs. 1970157 Add: Interest u/s 234B Rs. 10835863 Add: Interest u/s 234C Rs. 0 Total tax + Int payable Rs. 45641967 Less: Self tax paid Rs. Less: Regular by Rs. 29414128 adjustment of refund Balance Payable. Rs. 16227839 Madhucon Projects Limited, Hyderabad. 25. The assessee

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

ITA 1937/HYD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Mar 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 132Section 153ASection 254(2)Section 801ASection 80I

TDS Rs. 26165215 Less : Advance Tax Rs. 12000000 Balance Tax Rs. 32835948 Add: Interest u/s 234A Rs. 1970157 Add: Interest u/s 234B Rs. 10835863 Add: Interest u/s 234C Rs. 0 Total tax + Int payable Rs. 45641967 Less: Self tax paid Rs. Less: Regular by Rs. 29414128 adjustment of refund Balance Payable. Rs. 16227839 Madhucon Projects Limited, Hyderabad. 25. The assessee

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, NTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 86/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 113/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 87/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

OC NL INVEST COOPERATIEF U.A,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 112/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sri S.P. Chidambaram &For Respondent: Sri M.H. Naik, DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 234A

TDS credit was not given and the interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C was also levied. As there was no response to this application, the assessee filed a subsequent rectification application u/s 154

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 307/HYD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 308/HYD/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 310/HYD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS),WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 309/HYD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 304/HYD/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour

SIBY MINING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 306/HYD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri C. Suresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 201

rectification application must have been decided in its favour. No documents have been shown to us demonstrating any inquiry or efforts were made by the assessee for seeking information about its application u/s 154 of the Act. The assessee has taken the things for granted and wrongly presumed that the application made by it must have been decided in favour