BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

232 results for “TDS”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,904Mumbai1,622Bangalore678Chennai524Pune522Kolkata286Ahmedabad249Hyderabad232Jaipur215Raipur201Chandigarh134Visakhapatnam80Nagpur79Indore61Lucknow57Rajkot48Cochin45Cuttack44Surat42Jodhpur37Dehradun30Guwahati24Agra22Karnataka19Patna16Amritsar15Panaji15SC13Jabalpur13Ranchi8Allahabad4Calcutta3Kerala2Telangana2Orissa2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 153C92Addition to Income85Search & Seizure56Section 13250Section 143(3)47Section 139(1)40Section 6937Disallowance34Section 4027Penalty

TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 403/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Ms. R. Helen Ruby Jesindha, DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 37Section 37(1)

TDS is not in the nature of penalty and does not tantamount to breach of law or an illegal act or prohibited

Showing 1–20 of 232 · Page 1 of 12

...
23
TDS21
Section 80I18

WISSEN TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-17(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1082/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1082/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Wissen Technology Private Vs. Deputy Commissioner Limited Of Income Tax Bangalore Circle-17(2) [Pan : Aabcw5249H] Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Shri P.Prabhakara Murthy, Ar रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By:: Shri Srinath Sadanala, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 11/12/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 11/12/2024 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Manjunatha G., A.M: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 03.09.2024 Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Learned Cit(A)], Siliguri, Relating To A.Y.2018-19 On The Following Grounds : 1. In The Facts & Circumstances Of Appellant’S Case, The Impugned Order Under Section 250 Of I.T.Act Passed By Learned Addl/Jcit(A)-1, Siliguri, In Adjudicating The Appeal Filed Against Intimation U/S 143(1) Of I.T.Act Is Not Correct Both On The Facts & In The Law Applicable To The Facts Of The Appellant’S

For Appellant: Shri P.Prabhakara MurthyFor Respondent: : Shri Srinath Sadanala, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(v)Section 36(1)(va)

TDS to be allowed under section 37 of the Act. Only question therefore, that falls for our consideration is whether this interest partakes the character of a penalty

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. R R EDIFICE PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 416/HYD/2025[2017]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2025

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.416/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Acit Vs. Rr Edifice Pvt.Ltd. Central Circle-1(2) Hyderabad Hyderabad [Pan :Aasfr2521L]

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Ms.U Mini Chandran,CIT-DR
Section 194CSection 250Section 37(1)

TDS are compensatory in nature and not in nature of penalty. (x) The Ld.CIT(A) ought to have considered that

R R EDIFICE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE - 1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 439/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.416/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Acit Vs. Rr Edifice Pvt.Ltd. Central Circle-1(2) Hyderabad Hyderabad [Pan :Aasfr2521L]

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Ms.U Mini Chandran,CIT-DR
Section 194CSection 250Section 37(1)

TDS are compensatory in nature and not in nature of penalty. (x) The Ld.CIT(A) ought to have considered that

UPAKAR INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENT CIR-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 378/HYD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri Madan Mohan Meena
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 201Section 36(1)(iii)

TDS paid is compensatory in nature and not in nature of penalty, therefore should be allowed u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Act. Now the question

UPAKAR INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENT CIR-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 379/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri Madan Mohan Meena
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 201Section 36(1)(iii)

TDS paid is compensatory in nature and not in nature of penalty, therefore should be allowed u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Act. Now the question

VENKATESHWARA RAO DALAPATHIRAO,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 988/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: CA, B Satyanarayana MurthyFor Respondent: Sri Madan Mohan Meena, Sr. AR
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 270ASection 270A(1)Section 270A(2)(a)Section 270A(7)Section 274

TDS credit available against entire tax liability. The Assessing Officer levied penalty for 11 ITA.No.988/Hyd./2025 under-reporting of income

ASWARTHANARAYANA VENKATA RENIGUNTLA,DHARMAVARAM vs. ITO, WARD-1, ANANTAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 143/HYD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2017-18 Shri Aswarthanarayana Venkata Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Anantapur. Reniguntla, Dharmavaram, Andhra Pradesh. Pan : Alrpr5400R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M. Chandramouleswara Rao, Ca Revenue By: Sri A. Sitarama Rao. Date Of Hearing: 11.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.04.2023

For Appellant: Sri M. ChandramouleswaraFor Respondent: Sri A. Sitarama Rao
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 270ASection 271Section 271BSection 274Section 44A

penalty leviable under Section 271C on mere delay in remittance of the TDS after deducting the same by the concerned

KNR CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 382/HYD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Sri S.S. Godaraa.Y. 2016-17 Knr Constructions Limited, Vs. Dcit, Hyderabad. Circle-2(1), Pan: Aaack 8316 L Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue By Sri T. Sunil Goutam, Sr. Ar Date Of Hearing: 02/12/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 31/01/2022 Order

Section 143(3)Section 201Section 37(1)

TDS. The Assessing Officer disallowed the same holding that it is in the nature of penalty and therefore not allowable

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company are disposed of as under:

ITA 1529/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1501, 1514, 1515 & 1529/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Ay: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Apmdc Sccl Suliyari Coal Vs. Dcit, Company Limited, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aalca9755A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Mohan KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

TDS) under section 194A of the Act, but had not filed its return of income, initiated penalty proceedings under section

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE- 1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company are disposed of as under:

ITA 1515/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1501, 1514, 1515 & 1529/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Ay: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Apmdc Sccl Suliyari Coal Vs. Dcit, Company Limited, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aalca9755A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Mohan KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

TDS) under section 194A of the Act, but had not filed its return of income, initiated penalty proceedings under section

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company are disposed of as under:

ITA 1501/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1501, 1514, 1515 & 1529/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Ay: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Apmdc Sccl Suliyari Coal Vs. Dcit, Company Limited, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aalca9755A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Mohan KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

TDS) under section 194A of the Act, but had not filed its return of income, initiated penalty proceedings under section

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), HYDERBAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company are disposed of as under:

ITA 2272/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1501, 1514, 1515 & 1529/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Ay: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Apmdc Sccl Suliyari Coal Vs. Dcit, Company Limited, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aalca9755A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Mohan KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

TDS) under section 194A of the Act, but had not filed its return of income, initiated penalty proceedings under section

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company are disposed of as under:

ITA 1514/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1501, 1514, 1515 & 1529/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Ay: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Apmdc Sccl Suliyari Coal Vs. Dcit, Company Limited, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aalca9755A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Mohan KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

TDS) under section 194A of the Act, but had not filed its return of income, initiated penalty proceedings under section

APMDC SCCL SULIYARI COAL COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee company are disposed of as under:

ITA 2271/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1501, 1514, 1515 & 1529/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Ay: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Apmdc Sccl Suliyari Coal Vs. Dcit, Company Limited, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aalca9755A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Mohan KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. AR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

TDS) under section 194A of the Act, but had not filed its return of income, initiated penalty proceedings under section

NIPRO MEDICAL INDA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 531/HYD/2024[AY 2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Kishore Phadke, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36(1)

TDS & Disallowance for such default. 4. Duty Drawback ITA No.531/Hyd/2024 4 5. Expenditure by way of Penalty or Fine for Violation

VARA INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1166/HYD/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Apr 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar ChakrapaniFor Respondent: : Shri Srinath Sadanala, SR-DR
Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 69A

TDS already deducted by the contractor. Therefore, there would be no significant tax liability remaining, hence, the penalty should be dropped

VARA INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1) , SIGNATURE TOWERS, KONDAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1167/HYD/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Apr 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar ChakrapaniFor Respondent: : Shri Srinath Sadanala, SR-DR
Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 69A

TDS already deducted by the contractor. Therefore, there would be no significant tax liability remaining, hence, the penalty should be dropped

M/S KANTAR GDC INDIA PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY TNS INDIA PVT LTD),HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2261/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Hyderabad03 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.2261/Hyd/2017 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14) M/S. Kantar Gdc India (P) Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Ltd (Formerly Tns India (P) Circle 2(2) Ltd, Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aabcn2278F (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocate Harpreet Singh Ajmani राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Shiva Sewak, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 15/05/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 03/06/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Advocate Harpreet Singh AjmaniFor Respondent: : Shri Shiva Sewak, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 271(1)(c)

TDS of Rs. 12,24,29,606 instead of Rs. 12,25,25,224 as claimed in the Return of income Penalty

ACIT., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD vs. NEW CLUB, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 958/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivas, CAFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, SR-DR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 194ASection 69A

Penalty proceedings u/s. 271AAC(1) of the I.T.Act, 1961 for addition u/s.69A of the I.T.Act, 1961 are initiated separately. 3.2. It is also seen from TDS