NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

depreciation for assets acquired in earlier years since the capital expenditure was not allowed by Revenue during assessments completed. The learned Assessing Officer erred in granting lesser credit for TDS

T. SHESHAGIRI RAO, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-16(3, HYDERABAD vs. MYTRAH WIND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Mytrah Wind Developers Private Limited, Ward – 16(3), Gachibowli, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aaicm1274H. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Rajendra Kumar – Cit Dr 28.12.2022 Date Of Hearing: Date Of Pronouncement: 05.01.2023

depreciation @ 25% of the said value. vi) The assessee has claimed credit for the entire TDS of Rs. 63,19,418/- made

AISWARYA ART CREATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-RANGE -13, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarm/S. Aiswarya Art Vs. Income Tax Officer, Creations Pvt. Ltd., Ward 15(3), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan Aagca7479J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri T. Chaitanya Kumar, Adv. Respondent By : Shri Kumar Aditya, (D.R.) Date Of Hearing : 20.10.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 20.10.2022 O R D E R Per Shri Rama Kanta Panda, A.M. : This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dt.04.05.2018 Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Guntur Relating To Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In The Business Of Trading In Satellite Rights. The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income On 2 26.12.2011 Declaring A Total Income Of Rs.17,47,243. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass. Accordingly, Statutory Notices U/S. 143(2) & 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) Were Issued. However, There Was No Compliance From The Side Of The Assessee For Which Summon U/S. 131 Of The Act Was Issued & The Statement Of The Assessee Was Recorded On 29.01.2014 Wherein He Agreed To Furnish The Required Information By 30.01.2014. Since There Was No Compliance Despite Number Of Opportunities, The Assessing Officer Proceeded To Complete The Assessment U/S.144 Of The Act.

TDS has been made on the same. Similarly, the Assessing Officer has even disallowed the depreciation, power expenses, telephone expenses

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(2), HYDERABAD vs. EENADU TELEVISION PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

depreciation claimed on Film Software Library. The Assessing Officer while computing the tax payable granted 5. credit for TDS of Rs.6

VK WAREHOUSING ENTERPRISES,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee firm and the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of our observations recorded hereinabove

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.737/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18) M/S. V K Warehousing Enterprises, Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. Circle 6(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aakfv3288R (Appellant) (Respondent) आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.881/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, M/S. V K Warehousing Enterprises, Circle 6(1), Hyderabad. Vs. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Rajesh Vaishnav, C.A. राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Shri P. Dhivahar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 22/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/01/2026

TDS and remitted the same to the credit of the government. 7. The Hon’ble CIT(A) erred in not allowing depreciation

ACIT., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD vs. VK WAREHOUSING ENTERPRISES, HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee firm and

TDS and remitted the same to the credit of the government. 7. The Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in not allowing depreciation

OWENS CORNING INDUSTRIES (INDIA) P. LTD. MAHABUBNAGAR (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SAINT GOBAIN VETROTEX INDIA LTD),MAHABUBNAGAR DIST vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godaraassessment Year: 2004-05 Owens Corning Industries Vs. The Deputy Commissioner (India) Private Limited Of Income Tax, (Previously Known As Saint Circle 3(1), Gobain Vetrotex India Hyderabad. Limited), Hyderabad. Pan : Aaacv9858N. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri S. Rama Rao. Revenue By: Shri T. Sunil Goutam. Date Of Hearing: 17.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.02.2022 O R D E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. This Assessee’S Appeal For A.Y. 2004-05 Arises From The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 4, Hyderabad’S Order Dated 21.12.2015 In Case No.0217/Dcit, Cir.3(1)/2014-15/ Cit(A)-4/Hyd/2015-16 Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [In Short, ‘The Act’].

TDS, the same cannot be allowed as deduction u/s 40)a)(a) of the Act. Hence, the bushing charges of Rs. 80,99,675/- claimed as revenue expenditure is disallowed an added back to the total Income. An amount of Rs. 1,02,33,118/- towards additional metal charges which is capitalized by the appellant and claimed depreciation

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -3 (1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

depreciation of earlier assessment years. 9. That in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. AO is not justified in considering short credit of TDS

DIWAKAR ROAD LINES,ANANTAHAPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, ANANTAPUR

In the result, appeal for the assessment year 2014-15 is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

depreciation claimed by the assessee in respect of the transport vehicles is in question for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2016-17; whereas the remuneration admitted to the partners and also the non deduction of TDS

DIWAKAR ROAD LINES,ANANTAPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, ANANTAPUR

In the result, appeal for the assessment year 2014-15 is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

depreciation claimed by the assessee in respect of the transport vehicles is in question for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2016-17; whereas the remuneration admitted to the partners and also the non deduction of TDS

DIWAKAR ROAD LINES,ANANTAPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, ANANTAPUR

In the result, appeal for the assessment year 2014-15 is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

depreciation claimed by the assessee in respect of the transport vehicles is in question for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2016-17; whereas the remuneration admitted to the partners and also the non deduction of TDS

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. ATHENA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED (FORMERLY M/S VJIL CONSULTING LIMITED), HYDERABAD

In the result, the ground nos

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

TDS compliances. ITA No.895 896 and 4 1266/Hyd/2018 e) addition of 50% of sales promotion expenses of Rs.13,13,955/- amounting to Rs.6,56,978/- due to non- production of bills and vouchers. f) addition of Rs.1,27,840/- on account of depreciation

ATHENA GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the ground nos

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

TDS compliances. ITA No.895 896 and 4 1266/Hyd/2018 e) addition of 50% of sales promotion expenses of Rs.13,13,955/- amounting to Rs.6,56,978/- due to non- production of bills and vouchers. f) addition of Rs.1,27,840/- on account of depreciation

XILINX INDIA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the ground nos

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

TDS compliances. ITA No.895 896 and 4 1266/Hyd/2018 e) addition of 50% of sales promotion expenses of Rs.13,13,955/- amounting to Rs.6,56,978/- due to non- production of bills and vouchers. f) addition of Rs.1,27,840/- on account of depreciation

AP TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyassessment Year: 2017-18 A.P Tourism Development Vs. Dy. Cit Corporation Ltd, Circle 1(1) Vijayawada Hyderabad Pan:Aadca9817H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Advocate R. Mohan Kumar Revenue By: Shri Kumar Aditya, Dr Date Of Hearing: 24/05/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 24/05/2023 Order Per R.K. Panda, A.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Ex-Parte Order Dated 13/02/2023 Of The Learned Cit (A)-Nfac Delhi, Relating To A.Y.2017-18. 2. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is An A.P State Government Corporation Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956 & Established With The Main Objective Of Developing Tourism Infrastructure In The State Of Andhra Pradesh. The Corporation Is A State Govt. Company Since 1976. It Filed Its Return Of Income Declaring Total Loss Of Rs.9,95,84,720/-. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass & Statutory Notices U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Were Issued & Delivered Electronically To The Page 1 Of 6

depreciation of Rs.56,04,368/-. The Assessing Officer further noted from the 26AS statement that the assessee has received the following amount during the year: S.No Description of the Section under which TDS

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM vs. THE SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LT.D, KOTHAGUDEM, KOTHAGUDEM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

TDS on interest on land compensation deposited in court as per court order for AY 2009-110 to 2011-12. 7. Loss due exchange fluctuation on interest on capital borrowed in forex for acquisition of machinery after such assets is put to use for AY 2009-10. 8. Restriction of depreciation

SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

TDS on interest on land compensation deposited in court as per court order for AY 2009-110 to 2011-12. 7. Loss due exchange fluctuation on interest on capital borrowed in forex for acquisition of machinery after such assets is put to use for AY 2009-10. 8. Restriction of depreciation

THE SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LTD., KOTHJAGUDEM,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CITT, KHAMMAM RANGE, KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

TDS on interest on land compensation deposited in court as per court order for AY 2009-110 to 2011-12. 7. Loss due exchange fluctuation on interest on capital borrowed in forex for acquisition of machinery after such assets is put to use for AY 2009-10. 8. Restriction of depreciation