BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 11(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,881Delhi2,312Chennai836Bangalore796Ahmedabad502Kolkata473Jaipur440Hyderabad373Surat188Pune179Chandigarh174Indore173Raipur167Rajkot158Visakhapatnam109Cochin93Lucknow84Nagpur74Guwahati65Cuttack64Patna58Amritsar58Agra41Allahabad36Telangana30Jodhpur27Karnataka25Dehradun20Panaji18Ranchi9Orissa7Varanasi6SC5Jabalpur3Calcutta3Kerala3Himachal Pradesh2Uttarakhand1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

d) of the Act as they 7 were unable to spend 85% of its income during the year in question. He enhanced the income of the assessee to Rs.9,97,09,788/-. 11. The assessee then preferred appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which passed the order on 20.01.2016 allowing the appeals of the assessee. It accepted the plea

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

d) of the Act as they 7 were unable to spend 85% of its income during the year in question. He enhanced the income of the assessee to Rs.9,97,09,788/-. 11. The assessee then preferred appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which passed the order on 20.01.2016 allowing the appeals of the assessee. It accepted the plea