BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 147clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,538Delhi4,352Chennai1,303Bangalore1,111Kolkata964Ahmedabad853Jaipur574Hyderabad539Pune392Chandigarh285Indore261Raipur238Rajkot227Surat216Amritsar141Cochin141Visakhapatnam140Patna121Karnataka116Nagpur109Lucknow100Agra97Guwahati86Telangana65Cuttack61Dehradun57Jodhpur57Allahabad43Calcutta40Ranchi35SC27Panaji21Jabalpur13Kerala10Punjab & Haryana8Varanasi8Orissa8Rajasthan6Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2Madhya Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

Section 11 147 of the Act cannot be interpreted to have the consequence of conferring arbitrary powers on the Assessing Officer who may even initiate such reassessment

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019
HC Himachal Pradesh
22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

Section 11 147 of the Act cannot be interpreted to have the consequence of conferring arbitrary powers on the Assessing Officer who may even initiate such reassessment