BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 143clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,972Delhi4,825Chennai1,384Kolkata1,215Bangalore1,144Ahmedabad634Jaipur606Hyderabad472Chandigarh307Pune292Indore231Raipur221Rajkot197Cochin177Surat159Amritsar149Patna127Karnataka123Nagpur114Visakhapatnam100Lucknow96Guwahati92Agra83Ranchi70Dehradun68Cuttack63Telangana63Jodhpur58Calcutta40Allahabad40SC25Panaji22Orissa10Jabalpur10Punjab & Haryana9Kerala8Rajasthan7Varanasi4Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh2Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

143(3) of the Act during the regular assessment proceedings of the assessment years; the Assessing Officer, having applied his mind to the issue of corpus funds, after the assessee explained the same with evidences in the regular assessment, impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act (issued by the Assessing Officer stating that the earmarked funds shown

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

143(3) of the Act during the regular assessment proceedings of the assessment years; the Assessing Officer, having applied his mind to the issue of corpus funds, after the assessee explained the same with evidences in the regular assessment, impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act (issued by the Assessing Officer stating that the earmarked funds shown