BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi126Mumbai116Bangalore102Chennai33Jaipur31Kolkata23Pune20Lucknow17Hyderabad15Ahmedabad14Raipur13Visakhapatnam10Indore7Amritsar7Patna6Guwahati6Chandigarh6Surat4Cochin4Kerala3Himachal Pradesh2Rajkot2Jodhpur2Agra1Cuttack1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

12A of the Act even when the same were not reflected in the FCRA return of the assessee? 3. Whether the ITAT, on the basis of facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, has erred in acknowledging a new concept “Fund Pending Utilization” introduced by the assessee in its balance sheet and thereafter corroborating assessee

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

12A of the Act even when the same were not reflected in the FCRA return of the assessee? 3. Whether the ITAT, on the basis of facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, has erred in acknowledging a new concept “Fund Pending Utilization” introduced by the assessee in its balance sheet and thereafter corroborating assessee