BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 10(20)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,498Mumbai2,884Bangalore996Chennai975Jaipur700Kolkata598Ahmedabad539Hyderabad529Chandigarh290Surat260Pune257Raipur221Indore218Amritsar207Rajkot190Visakhapatnam123Cochin121Cuttack116Nagpur109Karnataka104Patna86Agra82Lucknow81Guwahati75Telangana67Dehradun46Jodhpur41Allahabad40Ranchi34SC30Panaji17Calcutta9Orissa6Rajasthan6Jabalpur5Varanasi3Kerala3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

10 2006-07 to 2009-10 12. In respect of assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10 in the case of the same assessee identical issues had arisen and the issues had also been decided in favour of the assessee by the CIT (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had upheld the same. The Tribunal concluded that ‘Funds Pending

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

10 2006-07 to 2009-10 12. In respect of assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10 in the case of the same assessee identical issues had arisen and the issues had also been decided in favour of the assessee by the CIT (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had upheld the same. The Tribunal concluded that ‘Funds Pending