BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai555Delhi418Chennai269Kolkata224Bangalore200Jaipur91Ahmedabad87Chandigarh67Hyderabad53Pune52Raipur47Rajkot36Indore34Cuttack21Allahabad21Agra21Nagpur20Amritsar19Cochin19Patna18Lucknow15Jodhpur13Surat11Visakhapatnam7Dehradun7Karnataka3Ranchi3Calcutta2Himachal Pradesh2SC2Guwahati2Varanasi1Panaji1Telangana1Rajasthan1Uttarakhand1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

u/s 148 of the Act merely because it felt that a decision which had been taken earlier needed to corrected. It relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Kelivinator of India Limited,1 to hold that reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated on the basis of a mere change of opinion. The Tribunal

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

u/s 148 of the Act merely because it felt that a decision which had been taken earlier needed to corrected. It relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Kelivinator of India Limited,1 to hold that reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated on the basis of a mere change of opinion. The Tribunal