BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,187Delhi1,041Chennai587Bangalore482Ahmedabad272Jaipur252Kolkata194Hyderabad187Chandigarh137Pune130Raipur110Indore89Rajkot64Lucknow57Cochin51Guwahati50Surat42Patna41Visakhapatnam39Nagpur38Ranchi38Amritsar32Jodhpur28SC18Agra17Dehradun16Cuttack15Karnataka12Allahabad12Telangana7Kerala5Rajasthan4Calcutta4Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana2Panaji1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Orissa1Jabalpur1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/29/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

exemption of 15% under Section 11(1)(a) and (d) of the Act as they 7 were unable to spend 85% of its income during the year in question. He enhanced the income of the assessee to Rs.9,97,09,788/-. 11. The assessee then preferred appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which passed the order on 20.01.2016 allowing

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. THE TIBETIAN CHILDREN VILLAGE

Accordingly the same are dismissed alongwith pending

ITA/31/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Aug 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

For Appellant: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

exemption of 15% under Section 11(1)(a) and (d) of the Act as they 7 were unable to spend 85% of its income during the year in question. He enhanced the income of the assessee to Rs.9,97,09,788/-. 11. The assessee then preferred appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which passed the order on 20.01.2016 allowing