56 ITR 198 (SC). In fact, State Bank of Travancore v. CIT (1986) 158 ITR 102 (SC) has already been distinguished in the case of Keshavji Ravji and Co. v. CIT (1990) 182 ITR 1 (SC) by a Bench of three judges in a similar fashion. It is held only as laying down that a circular cannot alter the provisions