BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,740Delhi4,191Bangalore1,387Chennai1,382Kolkata1,003Ahmedabad611Jaipur442Hyderabad411Indore326Pune301Raipur222Surat210Chandigarh188Nagpur147Visakhapatnam134Cochin127Rajkot115Amritsar105Lucknow102Karnataka89Cuttack60Allahabad52Jodhpur43Calcutta42Ranchi40SC30Guwahati29Telangana28Agra23Panaji23Dehradun19Patna19Varanasi18Kerala14Jabalpur10Punjab & Haryana6Rajasthan4Himachal Pradesh2Orissa2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 2602Section 542Section 143(3)2Deduction2

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. KESHAV DUTT SHREEDHAR

ITA/11/2020HC Himachal Pradesh27 Dec 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Ms. Justice Sabina & Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya Income Tax Appeal No. 11 Of 2020 Between:- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shimla. ….Appellant (By Sh. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate With Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate)

Section 143(3)Section 260Section 54

54 of the Income Tax Act (for short ‘the Act’) was claimed. On 29.11.2010 assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act was completed and returned income was accepted. 4. An objection was raised by the Revenue audit that assessee (respondent herein) had neither purchased the new residential house before 30.09.2008 nor he had deposited capital gain amount

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

54 of 2009 and 20 of 2011 Reserved on: 21.12.2024 Date of decision : 31.12.2024. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax &another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1Yes. For the appellants : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate