BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,719Mumbai1,526Kolkata804Bangalore638Chennai610Pune293Jaipur289Ahmedabad185Chandigarh178Hyderabad175Raipur146Indore125Visakhapatnam101Nagpur97Surat90Lucknow79Agra68Cuttack67Amritsar62Cochin55Guwahati31Jabalpur29Rajkot28Karnataka26Ranchi19Telangana18Jodhpur18Patna14SC13Panaji12Calcutta11Kerala9Allahabad8Dehradun8Varanasi8Punjab & Haryana4Himachal Pradesh3Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 43D4Section 362Section 1452Addition to Income2

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/83/2018HC Himachal Pradesh07 Dec 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Section 145Section 36Section 43D

disallowed under Section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from April 1, 1984. It is also relevant to note that the first proviso which came into force with effect from 21 April 1, 1988 was not on the statute book when the assessments were made in the case of Allied Motors (P) Limited (supra). However

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/82/2018HC Himachal Pradesh
07 Dec 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Section 145Section 36Section 43D

disallowed under Section 43-B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from April 1, 1984. It is also relevant to note that the first proviso which came into force with effect from 21 April 1, 1988 was not on the statute book when the assessments were made in the case of Allied Motors (P) Limited (supra). However

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

disallowing the deduction of Rs. 45,00,000/-, the CIT(A)recorded the following reasons:- a) As; there was no specific provision under Section 36 of the Act relating to contribution to leave encashment fund, the amount of Rs. 45,00,000/- paid into the said fund by the assessee had no statutory recognition. b) There was no ascertained liability