BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,147Delhi5,086Bangalore1,672Chennai1,630Kolkata1,408Ahmedabad863Jaipur665Hyderabad561Chandigarh381Pune365Indore353Surat306Raipur239Amritsar207Rajkot149Nagpur146Karnataka144Cochin139Visakhapatnam111Cuttack110Agra98Lucknow98Guwahati83Allahabad66Jodhpur60SC59Telangana54Calcutta45Patna32Ranchi31Dehradun29Panaji24Varanasi19Kerala14Jabalpur13Punjab & Haryana6Himachal Pradesh4Rajasthan3Orissa3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 80I6Section 804Section 43D4Section 139(1)3Section 1392Section 362Section 1452Deduction2Addition to Income

H.P.STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION vs. ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/56/2008HC Himachal Pradesh31 Dec 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

5. At the outset it appears that question number (x) as framed above has been carved out from the material which is not the subject matter of instant appeal nor has any argument been raised on such issue by either of the parties at the hearing of the matter. 6. The assessee filed its Income Tax Return

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/83/2018HC Himachal Pradesh07 Dec 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

2
Section 145Section 36Section 43D

5 in State Bank of Travancore Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Kerala, (1986) 2 Supreme Court Cases, 11, wherein it has been held as under:- “64. In CIT v. Motor Credit Co. Pvt. Ltd., the assessee, a private company, was carrying on business as financier for purchase of motor vehicles on hire purchase. It advanced under hire purchase agreements monies

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/82/2018HC Himachal Pradesh07 Dec 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA

Section 145Section 36Section 43D

5 in State Bank of Travancore Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Kerala, (1986) 2 Supreme Court Cases, 11, wherein it has been held as under:- “64. In CIT v. Motor Credit Co. Pvt. Ltd., the assessee, a private company, was carrying on business as financier for purchase of motor vehicles on hire purchase. It advanced under hire purchase agreements monies

Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHIMLA vs. HP HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HIMUDA)

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/35/2019HC Himachal Pradesh22 Dec 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MAMIDANNA SATYA RATNA SRI RAMACHANDRA RAO,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

43,724/- under Section 80IB(10) of the Act. 2(ii) The Assessing Officer (AO in short) in his assessment order dated 16.12.2009 under Section 143(3) of the Act declined the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80 IB(10) of the Act in its revised return. This was for the reason that the assessee had not filed